The Official Organ of LaborNET
click here to view the latest edition of Workers Online
The Official Organ of LaborNET
Free home delivery
September 2003   

Interview: Crowded Lives
Labor frontbencher Lindsay Tanner talks us through his new book on the importance of relationships and why politics is letting the people down.

Activists: Life With Brian
Work by men like Brian Fitzpatrick is exposing new Australians to old truths. Jim Marr reports

Industrial: National Focus
A showdown looms in Cancun, Qantas gets bolshie, casual and lazy in its response to aviation challenges, and long festering disputes fester on in Victoria and Tasmania reports Noel Hester in this national wrap.

Unions: If These Walls Could Talk
Trades Hall is preparing for a major facelift but first, Jim Marr reports, it must bid farewell to the colourful bunch who have populated its dusty corridors in recent years.

Economics: Beating the Bastards
Frank Stilwell looks at some of the proposals for building a fairer finance sector.

Media: Three Corners
So its come to this. Four Corners, one of the world's longest running television programs is now under pressure from an ABC Executive that is less cultural visionary than feral abacus.

History: The Brisbane Line
Percy Spender was Menzies' foreign minister, but, Neale Towart asks, was he also prepared to serve as Prime Minister in a Japanese controlled Australia?

Trade: The Dumping Problem
Oxfam-CAA helps set the scene for this month's World Trade Organisation in Cancun.

Review: Frankie's Way
In The Night We Called It A Day Frank Sinatra learns 'sorry' Down Under is a loaded word and refusal to say it when due will lose fans in important places, writes Tara de Boehmler.


The Soapbox
Staking Our Territory
ACTU secretary Greg Combet argued for a fairer Australia in his keynote address to last month's ACTU Congress.

The Locker Room
Seasonally Agisted
Spring is a season when a person�s thoughts turn to�horse racing. Phil Doyle reports on the fate of nags and folk heroes.

Beyond the Block
We are wild about the people who live in The Block but not too interested in those who are on the streets outside, writes Michael Rafferty.

The Westie Wing
Workers friend Ian West MLC, reports form the Bearpit about a project to raise awareness about trade unionism amongst young people.

The Awkward Squad
Paul Smith meets one of the new generation of British union leaders who is taking the ball up to the Blair spin team.


Relatively Speaking
At its heart, political debate has always been a struggle between competing views about how a society should organise itself to maximise the benefits for the majority of its citizens.


 Truckies Tip Safety on AGM Floor

 Geelong Lockout Claims Family Homes

 Aussie Labour Laws Fail US Test

 No Accident � Insurance Dough Rises

 Union Mum Wins

 Rheem Runs Cold On Entitlements

 Unions Take It Up for Footballers

 Drug Boss Fails Workers

 Ministers Urged to Take Responsibility

 Museum Jobs Face Extinction

 Less News And More Of It

 Legal Costs Threaten Access

 Learning for Life

 Activists Notebook

 Lyon Roars
 Spicey and Tart
 Tony and Pauline
 PNG Bags Plastic
 Fighting Words Craig Emerson
About Workers Online
Latest Issue
Print Latest Issue
Previous Issues
Advanced Search

other LaborNET sites

Labor Council of NSW
Vic Trades Hall Council
IT Workers Alliance
Unions on LaborNET
Evatt Foundation

Labor for Refugees



Beyond the Block

We are wild about the people who live in The Block but not too interested in those who are on the streets outside, writes Michael Rafferty.


The famous nostalgic novel and film Gone With the Wind, is a story of a white southern elite in America who live through great struggles over love, desire and ambition, where slave owning is still ok.

Anyone familiar with the story will know there is also a famous house called Tara, a grand old mansion, which is symbolic of the ambitions of the story's characters.

What has a fictional southern slave owner's mansion to do with the economics of modern Australia?

In Australia, housing is also a hugely symbolic statement about the sort of economy we live in.

Ownership of a modern and affordable home was for instance a strong desire of the post-war generation.

It was made much easier by major technological advances in housing design and construction made during and soon after the Second World War.

These advances made it possible for many returning servicemen and women to own and often build their own home.

By today's standards, many of these 1950's and 1960's houses, built with fibro and iron may seem modest and very basic.

But these houses were spacious, affordable, easy to build, and extend or renovate as families grew and changed. They were in short a significant advance over the small and overcrowded dwellings of the 1920's and 1930's.

They also gave people more secure tenure.

In this way, affordable housing was a major material down payment on the possibilities of the post-war world.

And along with the welfare state, public libraries and pools, and free education, affordable housing was an important part of a more egalitarian post-war Australia.

Home building was literally making housing for heroes. And the heroes were ordinary people like you and me.

Contrast that with the recent period of home building, and who have been the heroes of this boom.

The housing celebrated in this boom is not affordable, it is large, conspicuous and expensive.

Since the 1980's with tax-free status, and greed is good as the banner of society, owner occupied housing has become a major statement of who we are as individuals.

Quite simply where we live and what live in have become the symbols of individual success. The more it is worth, the more we are worth.

We may not live in Tara, the mansion of Gone with the Wind, but the fortunate few do.

Modern housing is not in short the homes the post-war generation were making.

The heroes of today's housing are not you and me, but the rich and the famous.

To make housing affordable again will probably require us to start questioning the heroes we celebrate.

The Things that Money Can't Buy

The federal parliament is currently undertaking an inquiry into poverty in Australia.

Much of the inquiry has so far been bogged down in debates about the definition of poverty.

This obsession with what poverty is may seem a bit ridiculous.

After all, we all know poverty when we see it.

But understanding what poverty is turns out to be very important.

The fault line in the current debate has been between those who argue that poverty should be defined as significant deprivation, and those who argue that poverty should be defined in terms of standards that are somewhere below community norms.

Both definitions share a view of poverty in material terms, in the things we consume.

And almost always, we calculate poverty in terms of monetary terms, since money is what we need to buy the things that keep us clothed, fed and housed.

And this sort of material poverty has been perhaps the major problem for societies for most of human history.

In our society, a lack of money is a pretty good indicator of poverty.

But there are lots of things that money can't buy.

There are many resources and much of our enjoyment that we get through social networks.

Think about all the things we get from friends, family and workmates.

For instance, can you compare a great summer barbecue shared with friends or family with any amount of money? Or what about the pleasure of a day at the beach?

Of course wealthy people often have access the more of these networks than do the poor. The old school tie is one example of how elite private schools have provided resources to their alumni.

But we often forget in thinking about poverty that we have do things to get money - we have to go to work.

In the 1950's and 1960's, it was often expected that technology and better social organization would mean that we would have to spend less time working to get the money needed to live without poverty.

The 40-hour week was giving way to the 38 and even the 35 hour week. It seemed reasonable to hope that a 30 hour week was not that far off.

There was going to be less and less overtime and more and more barbecue and beach time.

But in the last twenty years, its gone the other way.

Average working hours have been going up, work is more pressured and households have been forced to have more than one person in full-time work.

The chances are that if you are reading this you are likely to be at work, on the way to work, or on the way home from work.

In short, while many have experienced rising material affluence, most of us have become increasingly time poor. Time poverty affects us materially too. How much time poverty exists we just don't know. We know workers in Australia now spend more time at work than in just about any other advanced economy. And time poverty is almost certainly getting more severe every day.

Consider the horrible term quality time. We have less free time, so are forced to try to make the smaller amount go further.

Perhaps it is time to start asking whether material poverty in things we consume is the only issue that we, and our political leaders, should be concerned with?

Michael Rafferty is a Senior Lecturer in the School of Economics and Finance at the University of Western Sydney


email workers to a friend printer-friendly version latest breaking news from labornet

Search All Issues | Latest Issue | Previous Issues | Print Latest Issue

© 1999-2002 Workers Online
Workers Online is a resource for the Labour movement
provided by the Labor Council of NSW
Last Modified: 15 Nov 2005

Powered by APT Solutions
Labor Council of NSW Workers Online