|
||
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
||
|
|
Issue No. 194 | 05 September 2003 |
|
||
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Relatively Speaking
Interview: Crowded Lives Activists: Life With Brian Industrial: National Focus Unions: If These Walls Could Talk Economics: Beating the Bastards Media: Three Corners History: The Brisbane Line Trade: The Dumping Problem Review: Frankie's Way
The Soapbox The Locker Room Housing Politics Postcard
 Lyon RoarsSpicey and TartTony and PaulinePNG Bags PlasticFighting Words Craig Emerson
|
|
|
Editorial Relatively Speaking
The story of political debate over the past hundred years has been a recurring contest of competing ideologies: the free market versus socialism, the state versus the individual and religious fundamentalism versus secularism. In practical terms, these debates have all been about applying an over-arching worldview into a set of laws to govern a society, with citizens of that society viewed very much as the passive consumers of the system. With the triumph of market-based democracies, citizens do get the opportunity to vote for their preferred provider of legislative services, but as political parties have converged this choice, it has become more one of style and nuance than of fundamental difference. In the past two decades the faultlines in Australia have further blurred, with two parties with different traditions (social democracy and liberalism) competing on their credentials as economic managers and service deliverers. It is hardly surprising, that for the majority of people squeezed into their roles as economic units in the market of life, politics means less to them than ever before. They just don't have the time. What has been missing in the political debate is an engagement with the lives of the people the system is meant to service, particularly the crisis in people's ability to maintain relationships in a global world. We talk about Medicare as an abstract, Telstra as a business, education as an aspiration. Yet we don't strip back the debates and look at how political and business decisions affect the lives of individuals. The experience of modern Australia is that while all the economic indicators say things have never been better, the people who are meant to benefit are over-worked, stressed and increasingly alone. These are the crucial issues that Federal Labor frontbencher Lindsay Tanner grapples with in his new book, Crowded Lives, launched this week. It's an ambitious and courageous work, not because it has a big picture solution, but rather the opposite: it calls for a new view of citizens, that sees them as members of a group, not just a subject or a consumer. It is based on the notion that the best things in life are not things - but intangibles like friendship, time with families, and community participation. According to Tanner the first step is for governments to view the impact of their decisions on the relationships between people at all different levels as a threshold. From there good policy must inevitably flow. If the time has come to construct a new politics that links the state and individuals by focussing on the state's role in building and maintaining relationships, then Tanner's contribution could be an important building block. Peter Lewis Editor
|
| Search All Issues | Latest Issue | Previous Issues | Print Latest Issue |
|
© 1999-2002 Workers Online 
|
|
