![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Issue No 85 | ![]() |
23 February 2001 |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Letters to the EditorService Fees a Cop Out
OK. I'm forced into it, given the gung-ho Workers Online support for non-unionist levies. I think we need to be fairly careful about the trade union bureaucracy's push for fees from non-unionists. I'll admit to being concerned about these fees. Your headline - "Union Members Tell Scabs: Sing for Your Supper" only re-inforces my concern. First, where are these all these union members telling non-unionists to sing for their supper? Not in my workplace. Secondly, I had always understood a scab was someone who crossed a picket line to undermine a strike or other industrial action. People who are not members of a union are not scabs per se. Your headline implies that non-unionists are incapable of being persuaded to join a union. Crap. If the union movement mounted a concerted campaign to increase wages and conditions then non-members would join. Thirdly, to say to non-unionists 'sing for your supper' means that passive non-unionist workers should be penalised for their class stupidity. If a union were strong enough to impose a closed workshop I would support it.. But fees are a substitute for organising and imposing union consciousness on the workplace. And that's the rub. The trade union leadership, from their capitulation to the Accord to their surrender to Howard, fails to challenge the rule of capital - or even to defend wages, jobs and conditions through industrial action. The consequence of this lie of class collaboration - what's good for the bosses is good for workers - has been a loss of membership. The real trade union response should be a general industrial reply to increase wages and better conditions and defend jobs. Of course, given the pro-capitalist politics of almost all of the trade union "leaders" it won't happen. Instead of attacking the bosses, and thus attracting workers to join, our "leaders" will attack fellow workers. Just like the pro-capitalist trade union leadership has done since 1983. John Passant
|
![]() ![]() ![]() The new Workplace Relations minister relives his own union background and explains why he�s really just another worker at heart. Honestly. ![]() ![]() Australia might be burning, but is it a fire that can be brought under control? ![]() ![]() SDA delegate Maria Kavaratzis recounts how the Campsie Big W has been transformed into a union shop. ![]() ![]() Neale Towart looks back at how popular culture has treated those workers who have not considered themselves part of the collective. ![]() ![]() The Korean Metal Workers Federation recounts a week which culminated in violent attacks on workers outside the Daewoo factory. ![]() ![]() The millennial deadline might have passed, but Jubilee 2000 is not giving up the fight for debt cancellation for the world�s fifty-two poorest countries. ![]() ![]() As Africa attempts to deal with the HIV crisis, access to the medicines that can relieve victims� suffering is emerging as a major humanitarian issue. ![]() ![]() John Howard has claimed the Liberal Party�s decimation in Western Australia and Queensland as a triumphant vindication of his party�s embracing of the national competition policy. ![]() ![]() As we ponder the One Nation renaissance, a new book challenges the current debates around xenophobia and the perceived threat of danger from Asia. ![]()
Notice Board View entire latest issue
|
![]() |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
© 1999-2000 Labor Council of NSW LaborNET is a resource for the labour movement provided by the Labor Council of NSW URL: http://workers.labor.net.au/85/letters2_two.htmlLast Modified: 15 Nov 2005 [ Privacy Statement | Disclaimer | Credits ] LaborNET is proudly created, designed and programmed by Social Change Online for the Labor Council of NSW |