The Official Organ of LaborNET
click here to view the latest edition of Workers Online
The Official Organ of LaborNET
Free home delivery
November 2005   
F E A T U R E S

Interview: Public Defender
The CPSU's Stephen Jones has confronted the Howard Government's IR agenda at close quarters.

Legal: Craig's Story
An inquest in western NSW is a cautionary tale of the use of AWAs, writes Ian Latham

Unions: Wrong Way, Go Back
The WorkChoice legislation sends Australia down the wrong economic road by smashing the instittutions that have made it strong, argues Greg Combet.

Industrial: WhatChoice?
The Howard Government has shown itself to be the master of illusion, writes Dr Anthony Forsyth

Politics: Queue Jumping
The changes to industrial laws, betray a new vision of Australian society, writes James Gallaway.

History: Iron Heel
Conservative governments using laws to take away basic civil rights. It's nothing new, writes Rowan Cahill

Economics: Waging War
When was the last time you heard an Australian politician talk about incomes policy, asks Matt Thistlethwaite

International: Under Pressure
The push for UN intervention in Burma is intensifying, following a report by Vaclav Havel and Bishop Desmond Tutu into slave labour.

Poetry: Billy Negotiates An AWA
More and more people are meeting Billy, the hero of page 15 of the WorkChoices booklet, including our resident bard, David Peetz

Review: A Pertinent Proposition
Nick Cave's "Australian western" touches on some themes still relevant today, Julianne Taverner writes.

C O L U M N S

The Soapbox
Men and Women of Australia
What makes a perfect speech? Michael Fullilove has scoured Australian history to find out.

The Locker Room
The Hungry Years
Phil Doyle gets the feeling we’ve been here before

Culture
From Little Things
Paul Kelly's song about the battle for land rights misses one important character, writes Graham Ring

Parliament
The Westie Wing
Ian West takes a look at Public Private Partnerships, and wonders if we should all just drink rum…

E D I T O R I A L

Terror Laws
It was poetic really, the WorkChoices legislation, all 1,000 plus pages of it, introduced into Federal Parliament this week under the cloak of terror.

N E W S

 D-Day For Political Rights

 Bosses In Sack Race

 “Choice” By Decree

 Howard Barges Into Workplace

 Della Grounds Boeing

 Wal-Mart Sees the Light

 Libs Chicken Out

 Shame Ships Filch Fish

 Multis Line Up to Cheer

 Feds in Dock

 Santoro Waves Red Rag

 Activist's What's On!

L E T T E R S
 We're Next
 Australia, 2005
 Truth in Advertising
 Investment Advice
 What a Woman!
 It's Not Pretty
 Screwed
WHAT YOU CAN DO
About Workers Online
Latest Issue
Print Latest Issue
Previous Issues
Advanced Search

other LaborNET sites

Labor Council of NSW
Vic Trades Hall Council
IT Workers Alliance
Bosswatch
Unions on LaborNET
Evatt Foundation


Labor for Refugees

BossWatch



Parliament

The Westie Wing


Ian West takes a look at Public Private Partnerships, and wonders if we should all just drink rum…

In today's mixed economy, where taxpayers underwrite the risks involved in PPPs, the public deserves to get a proper return on that investment.

It's always been hard to sell taxes or debt financing to fund infrastructure and services to the constituency, especially when your political opponents keep promising less taxes and focus on self-reliance as the basis for society.

We are well into an insatiable economic rationalist quest for higher profits and lower taxes, to a place where greed is good, where the individual is encouraged at the expense of the public good. We have the absurdity of record levels of private and household debt compared with record levels of balanced Government budgets.

In the context of small revenue bases and flat taxes, PPPs seem like an expedient way to go. But PPPs have been around a while.

Just under 200 years ago, Australia had its first Public Private Partnership, on the site of the current NSW Parliament.

When Governor Macquarie arrived in Sydney in 1810, he found that the town's hospital consisted of some tents and a few temporary buildings.

Head Office in Britain refused to provide funds to build a permanent hospital, so Governor Macquarie entered into a contract with some local businessmen. In return for building the hospital, the consortium would receive free labour, building supplies and a monopoly on rum imports.

But the agreed monopoly amount of 45,000 gallons was soon increased to 60,000 gallons.

Shortly after completion of the Rum Hospital, architects condemned the hospital for its shoddiness and many shortcomings. Despite Macquarie requesting the contractors to make amends, the quick patch up job failed to remedy the defects.

The "rum contract" was Australia's first PPP.

Later, along Parramatta Road, private contractors were allowed to open tollbooths for horse and cart. People complained but the tolls continued through to 1883.

And so the tradition of publicly funded private sector building programs through PPPs and tolls continues...

But recent experience is putting more than a few holes in the accepted thinking. People are talking about many different ways to finance and manage infrastructure - bonds, debt, taxes, user charges, levies, private finance - and maybe even a "real partnership" between private and public.

It's just that some approaches are more expedient than others...

The latest attack on decency and a fair-go - called "WorkChoices" and shepherded in by "Anti-terror" laws - complements the general push into less taxes and decreasing Government investment.

In an age where personal capital - shareholder assets, superannuation funds, and so forth - is encouraged, it should equally be okay to encourage Government ownership and capital investment. But things get turned upside down by the Conservatives - the number one cheerleaders in the decline of public and social capital.

Have a look at Telstra - there are foreign Governments lining up to buy the remainder of our national telecommunications system. In economic parlance, they're prepared to "Manage the risk."

But according to our Federal Government, it's just not on to have a national telecommunications system owned by Australian taxpayers.

We have the Federal reactionary conservative regime of Howard and Costello - and their State puppets, Debnam and someone or other - keeping on with the mythology of "Government is bad, the Private sector is good!"

But history shows us the Private sector isn't exactly the Manager and Purveyor of all things good. Just take a look at HIH, Enron, WorldCom, OneTel...

And we know the private sector and shareholders have unending appetites.

Those yearly dividends and profits are never enough. Reaction to each record profit announcement is to cut yet more jobs and wages. The call on Government is to cut taxes and regulation. And we have CEOs and shareholders maximising salaries and dividends, many times at the expense of workers' pay, workplace safety as well as the environment.

Meanwhile we have Howard and Costello continuing to entrench the cycle of tax bribes on the back of cuts to social spending and economic infrastructure. And we have a public that readily accepts these lines taken from the private sector and joining in the chorus.

It's acknowledged governments of all persuasions have not invested enough in infrastructure - things like water, schools, hospitals, rail - and we'll be seeing the effects of the rationalist approach for decades to come.

Infrastructure - social and economic - is what we rely on to contribute to society and help ourselves. Social infrastructure includes schools, hospitals, housing, police stations and parks. Economic infrastructure includes railways, roads, ports, utilities and telecommunications.

Most of the infrastructure in Australia has been provided by the public sector. But there are problems with committing to infrastructure - there are high initial capital costs, projects are time consuming to build and operate when compared to the political cycle, and these things aren't usually built as projects in themselves but rather to support other social and economic activities.

Compare those challenges with the gearing of the private sector. The private sector is profit driven and hasn't exactly been enamoured by things like long payback periods.

Certainty of income isn't what drives the private sector. Social stability isn't exactly top of the list for multinationals and venture capitalists. For them, it's best to keep the conga line of feather dusters and spin doctors "moving forward" into new opportunities and calling for the next tax cut, dividend cheque or retainer.

Do we have to wait until the whole thing collapses, New Orleans style, before we can successfully argue for things like infrastructure bonds or using public sector borrowing to ensure the job gets done?

Shouldn't it be okay to demand that contracts be real partnerships? If taxpayers effectively underwrite the risks, shouldn't they get a share in the returns?

The widespread acceptance that private is "profit" (good) and public is "loss" (bad) - must be challenged.

It's time for public shareholders - that is, taxpayers - to demand more.

Taxpayers ought to demand a real partnership in PPPs. Taxpayers ought to demand a bigger stake in infrastructure and services spending and be prepared to pay for them. Taxpayers surely would support adequate taxes for proper services and infrastructure. And they would support more control over, and returns on, those investments in theirs and their children's futures.

The private funding of infrastructure projects policy need a major rewrite. Competition policy is failing when NSW taxpayers become hostage to the private sector.

The NSW Public Accounts Committee inquiry into PPPs, called for by ALP Conference earlier this year, provides one opportunity to have a look at what can work in the future.

In the next few years some PPPs slated for go-ahead include arrangements for our drinking water. As recently reported, if we don't get it right, NSW taxpayers might face the bizarre situation of having full dams but be forced to buy privately produced water.

If NSW taxpayers can't be convinced that they need to directly invest in shoring up things like their drinking water, the most basic of human necessities, then perhaps we'd be better off just getting stuck into the rum.

If you require assistance accessing information from a NSW Government Department or a Minister, or have feedback and ideas for speeches, or if you believe you know an issue that should be looked at by one of the Parliamentary committees, contact me at Parliament House on (02) 9230 2052 or email [email protected]


------


email workers to a friend printer-friendly version latest breaking news from labornet


Search All Issues | Latest Issue | Previous Issues | Print Latest Issue

© 1999-2002 Workers Online
Workers Online is a resource for the Labour movement
provided by the Labor Council of NSW
URL: http://workers.labor.net.au/features/200511/c_tradeshall_westie.html
Last Modified: 15 Nov 2005

Powered by APT Solutions
Labor Council of NSW Workers Online
LaborNET