The Official Organ of LaborNET
click here to view the latest edition of Workers Online
The Official Organ of LaborNET
Free home delivery
November 2004   

Interview: The Reich Stuff
Robert Reich has led the debate on the future of work � both as an academic and politician. Now he�s on his way to Australia to help NSW unions push the envelope.

Economics: Crime and Punishment
Mark Findlay argues that the present psychological approach to prison programs is increasing the likelihood of re-offending and the threat to community safety.

Environment: Beyond The Wedge
Whether the great forestry divide can ever be overcome or whether it is best sidestepped for the sake of unity and sustainability in other areas is up for debate, writes Tara de Boehmler.

International: The End Of The Lucky Country
Linda Weiss, Elizabeth Thurbon and John Mathews show us How To Kill A Country

Safety: Tests Fail Tests
Nick Lewocki from the RTBU lifts the lid on the shonky science behind RailCorp testing

Politics: Labo(u)r Day
John Robertson lets fly at this years Labor Day dinner

Human Rights: Arabian Lights
Tim Brunero reports on how a Sydney sparky took on the Taliban and lived to tell the tale.

History: Labour's Titan
Percy Brookfield was a big man who was at the heart of the trade union struggles that made Broken Hill a quintessential union town writes Neale Towart.

Review: Foxy Fiasco
To find out who is outfoxing who, read Tara de Boehmler's biased review of a subjective documentary about corrupt journalism.

Poetry: Then I Saw The Light
Brothers and sisters! Praise the Lord! Brother George has saved the White House from an invasion by infidels, writes resident bard David Peetz.


The Locker Room
In Naming Rights Only
Phil Doyle has Gone to Gowings

The Soapbox
Homeland Insecurity
Rowan Cahill tells us how the Howard Government�s appointment of Major-General Duncan Lewis to head up the national security division of the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet has received little critical comment, until now.

The Westie Wing
New proposed legislation in NSW provides a vital window of opportunity for unions to ensure they achieve convictions for workplace deaths, writes Ian West.


What�s In a Name?
McDonalds is doing it, IAG has done it, James Hardie desperately needs to do it � and now the Labor Council of NSW is doing it, re-working its brand to meet the changing demands of their markets.


 Unions Dump Labor

 Shearers Brush Woolly Mammoths

 Girls Should Be Short Changed

 Sydney Turns Down Volume

 Minister Rides Collie

 Staff, Trees Weather the Blame

 Offshore Embassy for Families

 Visy Paper Folds

 Workers Unplug Power Cuts

 Silverwater Offers Porridge

 Environment Wiped Out In Dubbo

 Justice Eludes Kariong Staff

 Nelson Flags Another Raid

 Five Steps to Sanity

 Activists What's On!

 Too Young
 Let's Start A New Party
About Workers Online
Latest Issue
Print Latest Issue
Previous Issues
Advanced Search

other LaborNET sites

Labor Council of NSW
Vic Trades Hall Council
IT Workers Alliance
Unions on LaborNET
Evatt Foundation

Labor for Refugees



The End Of The Lucky Country

Linda Weiss, Elizabeth Thurbon and John Mathews show us How To Kill A Country


How to kill a country - Step 6

You get a lousy deal, so how do you sell it?. First you loudly congratulate yourself on having achieved a magnificent outcome. Then you identify the winners and losers and set one against the other, bribing some, bullying or browbeating other, and generally making sure that nobody sees the national interest as a whole. Then you demonise any dissenting voice as anti-free trade and, above all, hostile to good relations with the foreign party involved. Finally, you buy off or intimidate the press and broadcasting services. There is, however, one sector you cannot buy off and the is the publishers of books. Thank havens nobody reads them!

The question that remain at the end of this analysis is: why would a government and a country accede to a deal that is so flagrantly at odds with their interest? In trying to make sense of this puzzle, we focus here on two main issue:

How the government negotiated itself into this mess in the first place.

How the government sold this disastrous deal to the Australian public.

We conclude with an examination of what Australians can do to minimize the dangers that lie ahead.

How the deal was done

We know that prior to this deal, Australia had twice been approached by the United States for a bilateral trade deal (in 1992 and 1997), and twice rejected this offer on national interest grounds. So what lay behind our government's recent about-face? What prompted the Howard Government to initiate free trade talks with the United States in 2001? What had changed so dramatically in the space of four years?

One of the most significant changes was the collapse of multilateral trade talks in Seattle in 1999, which called the future of the WTO system into question. As multilateralism stalled, countries wanting speedier results on trade and investment liberalisation began throwing their efforts into regional and bilateral trade agreements. Now Australia was had always been a leading advocate of mulitlateralism, and was loathe to break with the tradition. But as bilateral and regional agreements proliferated around us, a fear emerged that if we did not jump on the bilateral bus, we might find ourselves left behind. Fear of being frozen out of trade agreements played heavily on the minds of Australian officials, and undoubtedly contributed to the decision to throw caution to the wind and seek a deal with the biggest kid on the block.

The desirability of the united States as a bilateral partner was boasted by September 11 and the Bali Bombing and the emergence of the "war on terror" as a new national priority; a free trade deal with the United States would be one more like in the chain binding us together with the world's military superpower - a safe bet in such uncertain times. In the words of Australian Trade Minister Mark Vaile:

.....and FTA with the United States offers us not just direct economic and commercial benefits. Because of the sheer size and reach of the United States, the FTA will provide Australia with spin-off benefits far beyond the actual text of the agreement. It is an opportunity to negotiate deeper integration with not only the world's largest economy, but also the world's pre-eminent strategic power .... it is an opportunity to put our economic relations on the same nature footing as our political and security relations.

'Special deals for special friends'?'

There was, however, another reason for our new-found faith in a trade deal with the United States: the idea that our loyal support for the United States in two of its most internationally unpopular efforts - the invasion of Afghanistan and the Iraq war - would translate into economic wins. Without a doubt, there was tacit view in the Australian government that toeing the line on military and foreign affairs would translate into a special deal on trade and economic affairs. The following excerpt from a television interview with both Mark Vaile and former trade negotiator (and leading FTA enthusiast) Alan Oxley is particularly illuminating in this regards:

Helen Dalley: But now should be the best time ever for Australia to pull off a trade coup with Washington. As our troops stand shoulder-to-shoulder with Americans against the axis of evil, Australia is one of very few countries offering unfailing support for the United States ... The effusive support for John Howard in the Congress is a rarity for a foreign head of state . the Australian proponents of a US-Australia FTA claim the time is indeed ripe for a trade pay-off.

Alan Oxley (Aust. APEC Study Centre): We've got a special relationship with the United States, which the PM seems to have intensified. Maybe he lucked in, and I think our contribution in Afghanistan produced a dividend. The President agreed that the United States would negotiate a FTA with us in full knowledge that it would be difficult for them because of the attitudes of US farmers.

Helen Dalley: So this may be the trade pay-off because we're part of the coalition of the willing?

Alan Oxley: I think it'd be a mistake to say that we're going into Iraq in order to get the pay-off. The two are independent, but I think very plainly there is a sympathy.

Helen Dally: But do you think it does help that we're in he military alliance? Id this a kind of pay-off?

Allan Oxley: It'll be a pay-off yes.

extract from How To Kill A Country - Australia's Devastating Trade Deal With The United States by Linda Weiss, Elizabeth Thurbon and John Mathews (Allen & Unwin)


email workers to a friend printer-friendly version latest breaking news from labornet

Search All Issues | Latest Issue | Previous Issues | Print Latest Issue

© 1999-2002 Workers Online
Workers Online is a resource for the Labour movement
provided by the Labor Council of NSW
Last Modified: 15 Nov 2005

Powered by APT Solutions
Labor Council of NSW Workers Online