The Official Organ of LaborNET
click here to view the latest edition of Workers Online
The Official Organ of LaborNET
Free home delivery
August 2004   
F E A T U R E S

Interview: Trading Places
New ACTU International Officer Alison Tate cut her teeth delivering aid to developing nations through APHEDA. Now she is helping chart the global union agenda.

Safety: Snow Job
James Hardie has been drilled into our collective consciousness as a story of power, greed and immorality. It is also, as Jim Marr reports, a tale of human tragedy.

Politics: In the Vanguard
Damien Cahill reveals how neo-liberal think tanks have been at the forefront of the corporate assault upon trade unions and social movements in Australia.

Unions: Gentle Giant Goes For Gold
Don’t get between Sydney sparkie Semir Pepic and a gold medal in a dimly lit alley, writes Tim Brunero.

Bad Boss: 'Porker' Chases Blue Ribbon
Perfect Porker, Darren Vincent, brings a history of meat worker shafting to this month’s Bad Boss nomination.

International: Cruising For A Bruising
Europe’s big unions are bruised as they watch companies roll over some of their best-organised unionised workplaces demanding longer work hours – without any recompense, reports Andrew Casey.

History: Under the Influence
Was John Kerr drunk when he wrote and signed the letter dismissing Edward Gough Whitlam from the Prime Ministership in 1975? Geraldine Willissee investigates.

Economics: Working Capital
Where superannuation fits, where it fails and what we should we do about it. Neale Towart gives the tough answers.

Review: Fahrenheit 9/11
There's many a must see moment in Mike Moore's new flick but beating the propaganda machine at its own game wreaks havoc with wearied bullshit detectors, writes Tara de Boehmler.

Poetry: Bad Intelligence Rap
When Flood washed away the PM's sins, the truth was once again left high and dry.

Satire: Osama Bin Manchu
During a recent visit to an elderly relative in a nursing home, I was waylaid by an ancient gentleman who insisted I listen to what he had to say, writes Rowan Cahill.

C O L U M N S

Parliament
The Westie Wing
The Labor Governments in each State must take the lead to stop the abuse of corporate law in Australia in the absence of action from the Federal Government, as the Inquiry into James Hardie’s has highlighted, writes Ian West.

The Soapbox
Cleaners Deserve Our Support
It's time the state's cleaners were given some support, loyalty and long service leave, writes Chris Christodoulou.

The Locker Room
Half Time At The Football
Phil Doyle wants to have his pie and eat it too.

Tribute
Faithful Servant
Frank Mossfield was one of the labour movement’s quiet achievers. Former Labor Council secretary Michael Easson pays tribute.

Postcard
Lessons From East Timor
Just back from a study tour to East Timor, National Reserach Officer with the Construction division of the CFMEU, Ben Stirling, writes about the experience for Workers Online.

E D I T O R I A L

Tarnished Rings
As our athletes approach the starting line in Athens, it is interesting to reflect on how the world has changed since Sydney was the centre of a global group hug just four years ago.

N E W S

 Stink Rises from Hamberger

 ALP Embraces Collectivism

 Bully Drives Deckhand into Drink

 Fighter in Cancer Link

 Tunnellers Dig in for Safety

 Seconds Out in Newcastle

 Vale Josh Heuchan

 "Betrayal" Sparks Election Rethink

 Councils Wedge James Hardie

 Great Southern Death Rattler

 Libs Desert "War Criminal"

 Casuals Take Over

 ALP Star Hits The Waterfront

 Activists What’s On!

L E T T E R S
 An Officer And A Teacher
 Tom Goes Asexual
 Road Rage At Work
 Democracy In Action
 Asbestos Bastadry
WHAT YOU CAN DO
About Workers Online
Latest Issue
Print Latest Issue
Previous Issues
Advanced Search

other LaborNET sites

Labor Council of NSW
Vic Trades Hall Council
IT Workers Alliance
Bosswatch
Unions on LaborNET
Evatt Foundation


Labor for Refugees

BossWatch



Interview

Trading Places

- Interview with Peter Lewis

New ACTU International Officer Alison Tate cut her teeth delivering aid to developing nations through APHEDA. Now she is helping chart the global union agenda.
 

You must have the most sought after job in the union movement now. What do you want to achieve out of being the International Officer for the ACTU?

This role provides a great opportunity to promote labour standards and respect for workers rights. In the big picture, the biggest challenges in coming years will be how the Australian trade union movement engages with the changing economic and political conditions in countries like Indonesia, China and our smaller neighbours in the Pacific. I have a real passion for international issues. The eradication of poverty and the attainment of sustainable development would be a great human achievement. Making it happen requires huge effort and great political will. Working on that, to me, is great job.

I think there's a lot that can be done in bringing together different perspectives on what the priorities are for the Australian trade union movement internationally. I think we're moving into a different phase right now in terms of both how the trade union movement looks at international issues and what the factors that are challenging Australian workers internationally are all about. In the next phase the Free Trade Agreements negotiated and signed off on have very direct impacts on the conditions for workers in Australia and what we want to see longer term. These Agreements also raise questions about conditions for workers in the other countries. We have the US Free Trade Agreement, the agreement with Thailand and with Singapore and the big one that's coming up is China. So these trade issues will present a big challenge and also a really incredible opportunity to really lay the foundations for the future. For example, the future of Australia's trade will redefine the way we link with trade unionists from around the globe. So there's some big challenges and I'm really interested in supporting the Australian trade union leadership in coming to terms with those challenges and negotiating a really good position.

Of course the key issue that International union bodies are continually pushing is Core Labor Standards. How successful have we been in getting these included into these bi-lateral trade treaties that are currently being negotiated?

Well in fact, mostly core Labor Standards haven't even really hit the deck in terms of the Free Trade Agreement process - both in terms of core labor standards or more general workers rights. In general they have not been taken seriously by the Australian Government in these negotiations and that's a big challenge for us.

Wasn't it true that at one stage the American's wanted Labor Standards in the US/Australia Free Trade Agreement and Australia wouldn't cop it?

That's right. Exactly.

So what does that say about the current Australian Government's attitude?

Well I think that it's pretty clear (that workers rights and Core Labor Standards don't even rate a mention in terms of our current government's position. Its something that every Free Trade Agreement needs as a fundamental aspect of what forms the actual terms for those agreements. In the case of the US/Australia Free Trade Agreement it's my understanding that the US raised it and the Australian Government squashed it. We've got to ensure that protections are put in place for jobs, for conditions, or we'll see a race to the bottom.

The whole debate around bilateral solutions to complex problems is a hot issue in terms of global security and also in trade. Is it the way to go? What would be different about working through multi-lateral solutions?

The most effective initiatives coming from the UN and the International Labor Organisation have been to get agreement and strengthen the multi-lateral processes. They actually provide protection for people in countries and opportunities for people in different countries, taking into account the different kinds of conditions for people and societies.

The problem with bilateral agreements is it comes down to two often unequal playing fields, two different levels of power. Note Australia and East Timor. If you can look at bringing the strengths from a number of different countries together then you can often get a much better arrangement for people across the board, based on agreed international law, whether its relating to security or to trade or to culture.

Core labour standards under the ILO conventions are the minimum set of global rules for labour in the global economy and respect for them should be strengthened in all countries. Bi-lateral agreements can often undermine those if they don't take into account the body of really extensive work that we call International Law.

Speaking of the ILO the big initiative through the ILO has been the sanctions against Burma. How successful has that been and is it really a model for dealing with other countries?

Burma is a tough case. The military regime there is not interested in respect for workers rights or anyone's. They have a long history of absolute abuse. Unions are banned. Forced labour etc. There are so few pressure points that the International Community can really apply to Burma. I say the ILO's work has been outstanding in terms of the way a UN body can come together and co-ordinate and do practical work. Now the people who argue against sanctions say it hasn't really impacted the situation in Burma. It's true there is little evidence of change. But the other way to look at it is to ask yourself what is actually going to effect change to such a regime. The people in Burma clearly want change and what can we best do to support that? The sanctions have certainly provided the most pressure on Burma in recent years and the sanctions I say, is very important in ensuring that the Burmese regime, the SPDC, know that the International community is serious. The hip pocket argument. Otherwise what they see is a whole bunch of resolutions passed at the Human Rights Commission or various different UN bodies that are not enforcible. So clearly it's both an act of solidarity but also practical to use the mechanisms that are available to the International community. The Burmese regime isn't going to change overnight, and its been years, and years and years but you know when you really look at what room there is to apply pressure for both respect for human rights and for creating space for civil society within Burma, then the ILO's work is been really essential. The regime does take notice of the ILO. The ILO, with other international bodies, is a good model for dealing with the tough cases I think.

We're currently in a world where the power of global capital is increasing. What sort of work is being done internationally to match that global power?

The World Commission on the Social Dimension of Globalization, which was initiated by the ILO, is the first systematic attempt to deal with the social dimensions of those processes, such as the creation of decent jobs and how globalization can be made fair and inclusive. The Commission has been looking at what setting labour standards can achieve in terms of justice and sustainable development, and impacts on health, what globalization means in terms of general access to health services, basic education, adult education, vocational education, HIV/AIDS, access to treatments, all these factors that impact more and more people on the globe. The issues are not new, but the dimension of their impact are. These are issues that people who have an interest in workers rights need to understand well.

Finally the ACTU does have its own Aid Agency for the region, APHEDA what's its priorities and how does it work with the ACTU?

APHEDA-Union Aid Abroad was set up in 1984 to provide solidarity with workers in the developing world. It has programs operating in 15 countries and they are all about empowering people to gain the vocational skills and to be able to generate their own income and support their families and societies. APHEDA Union Aid Abroad works directly with some of the poorest and most marginalised, including refugee communities, and with workers in rural communities, not only in industrial sectors. It's very important I think, both as an act of solidarity and also practically to link with countries who are our neighbours and those who are going through really tough economic transitions and tough times. The priorities for Union Aid Abroad are addressing the needs that workers in the 15 countries where Union Aid Abroad works have and for them to be able to achieve their own sustainable economic and social development. The ACTU is represented on APHEDA's management board and APHEDA's programs reflect ACTU policy.

And of course if people want to experience that first hand there are also APHEDA study trips

That's right. In fact, right now there's a group in East Timor, the first study tour to East Timor since the re-building process began. Union Aid Abroad on behalf of the Australian trade union movement has been very active in supporting the development of vocational education, community media, the health sector and the emerging trade union movement in East Timor. So people can get a real sense of that face-to-face. It's a great trip.


------


email workers to a friend printer-friendly version latest breaking news from labornet


Search All Issues | Latest Issue | Previous Issues | Print Latest Issue

© 1999-2002 Workers Online
Workers Online is a resource for the Labour movement
provided by the Labor Council of NSW
URL: http://workers.labor.net.au/features/200408/a_interview_tate.html
Last Modified: 15 Nov 2005

Powered by APT Solutions
Labor Council of NSW Workers Online
LaborNET