The Official Organ of LaborNET
click here to view the latest edition of Workers Online
The Official Organ of LaborNET
Free home delivery
February 2004   

Interview: Trading in Principle
AMWU national secretary, Doug Cameron, a key figure in the Labor movement, discusses the big issues - from Mark Latham to Pavlov�s Dogs.

Unions: While We Were Away
While Workers Online was washing sand from between its toes and enjoying an Indian summer at the cricket, there was a reality show chugging relentlessly away in the background, Jim Marr reports.

Politics: Follow the Leader
Worker�s Online tool man, Phil Doyle, dives into the ALP�s Darling Harbour love-in and nearly drowns in treacle.

Bad Boss: Safety Recidivist Fingered
The CFMEU has come up with a killer nomination to kick off our 2004 hunt for Australia�s worst employer.

Economics: Casualisation Shrouded In Myths
British academic, Kevin Doogan, sets the record straight on casualisation and warns unionists about the dangers of scoring an own goal

History: Worker Control Harco Style
Drew Cottle and Angela Keys ask if it's worth rememberinng the 1971 Harco work-in.

Review: Other Side Of The Harbour
The 1998 maritime dispute threatened to tear many a family apart but Katherine Thomson's Harbour tells the tale of at least one that it brought back together - albeit reluctantly, writes Tara de Boehmler.


The Soapbox
Dog Whistlers, Spin Doctor and Us
John Menadue argues the "better angels" of the Australian character are having their wings ripped off by an ever-expanding group dedicating to keeping the public at arms length from our decision-makers.

Something Fishy In Laos
Phillip Hazelton fishes around in Vientiane, Laos, and looks at the impact of Bird Flu on those relying on feathered friends for survival.

Magic Realism
Phil Doyle discovers that literature and sport may have more in common than you would think

The Westie Wing
Trickle, flood or drought? Workers friend Ian West, MLC, is wet, wet, wet on the issue of bilateral Free Trade.


All The Way With FTA?
Question marks over the bi-lateral Free Trade Agreement with the USA have only begun to scratch the surface.


 Rail Safety Back On Track

 Commuter Headaches Continue

 Ban "Ruthless" Operators - Judge

 Telstra Provokes Jobs Fight

 Taskforce Ignores Million Dollar Rorts

 Musos Tune-Up for Election Rock

 Chubby Fingers in Timorese Pockets

 Postal Workers Wrap Boss

 Aussie Sites Doing the Business

 Feds Abandon Aged

 TAFE Stands Over Poor Students

 Round the World on Aid

 Activists Notebook

 Reality TV
 TAFE Support
 State Of Confusion
 History Lesson
 Generation Angst
 Give Them A Medal
About Workers Online
Latest Issue
Print Latest Issue
Previous Issues
Advanced Search

other LaborNET sites

Labor Council of NSW
Vic Trades Hall Council
IT Workers Alliance
Unions on LaborNET
Evatt Foundation

Labor for Refugees



The Westie Wing

Trickle, flood or drought? Workers friend Ian West, MLC, is wet, wet, wet on the issue of bilateral Free Trade.

There's a lot of talk about "Free Trade" around at the moment and it serves as a good reminder of New South Wales's place in the world.

It's a sobering thought to see the current total budget of New South Wales standing at $35 billion next to a projected budget deficit in the USA of AUD$688 billion. That deficit alone is less than 5% of Gross Domestic Product for the USA.

So when John Howard and his cronies try to sell the line that Australia, let alone New South Wales, can compete equally with the USA under a "Free Trade Agreement" it is simply laughable. Australia's trading power is about as significant as a pimple on the arse of the imperial elephant.

That's not to say global trade is not worthwhile, just that it's a vicious game and the only way to succeed is to win. And winning is easiest when you're bigger and stronger than the rest.

It doesn't seem worth the effort if we can export a few utes to America at the price of losing control of the entire car manufacturing industry. It's not a plan for more jobs but a threat to our national sovereignty, identity and independence.

The bi-lateral Free Trade Agreement on beef is a prime example of the relative size of Australia and the USA. The latest agreement is to increase the export beef quota to 70,000 tonnes of beef a year by 2022.

The USA produces 70,000 tonnes of beef in less than two days. And when American diners have had their fill, the excess gets dumped on the export market, undercutting foreign beef exporters. Free Trade Agreement or not, America still gets fatter.

We know that the USA has the biggest guns and the biggest chequebook, so our chances of healthy competition are slim. Global trade is a war with few rules or regulations, so Australia must be sure about what part of the marketplace or battleground we want to excel in.

We might be allies with America in their war on terror but we're enemies in the trade war. And, of course, truth remains the first casualty of war. The text of the Bi-lateral Free Trade Agreement will slowly be revealed, but only after being heavily spin-doctored by both sides.

Premier Bob Carr, as Minister for the Arts, pointed out the disparity between the stories told by the Australian and United States Governments about media services. The US is claiming "unprecedented provisions to improve market access for US films and television programs" in Australia while the Federal Government claims to have protected local media content. The truth is that there will be no change to existing free-to-air rules but concessions to the US on pay-tv and the internet.

Another type of war where truth is the first casualty is general election campaigns, which are beginning in both Australia and the USA at the moment.

We've seen John Howard's naked exploitation of the issue of border protection--about "illegals" coming into our country and threatening our way of life, but when it comes to the Prime Minister holding the door open to American imperialism, it's a different matter altogether.

Of course, another big election issue in Australia is about Medicare, which goes hand-in-hand with the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). If Howard has his way, he will scrap bulk-billing and trade away the PBS to create a user-pays health system, just like America's.

The Free Trade Agreement with the USA contains an appeal mechanism in the review process of listing medication on the PBS. The huge American pharmaceutical companies want to charge more for their products than they can get the Government to buy them for. After all, these American pharmaceutical companies are the same crowd that would rather see 3,000 Zimbabweans die of AIDS every week instead of cutting some of their massive profits to provide affordable medicines to the Third World.

It is left to aid agencies such as APHEDA to deal with this unnecessary situation. What a coincidence it is that these same companies are also massive contributors to US Presidential election campaigns!

What has to be remembered in all the conservative talk of "Free Trade Agreements" is that they are not a new idea or a cure to all ills.

The colony of New South Wales was a strong supporter of Free Trade in the 1880s. The political parties of the day were called Free Traders and Protectionists. Tariffs were their concern and imports and exports was their game. In 1891, the price of wool slumped and that was a major cause of the 1890s depression.

And it's no different today when we see massive agricultural and industrial subsidies in place around the world, with large exporters trying to break down trade barriers so that they can reap the benefits alone. If they don't get their way, they dump surplus products on foreign markets to collapse prices.

The men and women of New South Wales and their families are all affected by trade agreements, because they influence employment and the price and quality of goods and services. The last thing we want is to be sold a deal where jobs go three for the price of one. We don't want Australian companies to be crushed by larger American firms. We want to keep our identity and enforce our sovereignty.

If Australia fights the trade war intelligently it can win in some sectors, but the stakes are very high and we are clearly bargaining from a position of weakness.

It is a challenging conflict that must be approached strategically if Australia and particularly New South Wales are to benefit.

For more information on What's On in NSW Parliament, go to (WARNING: sunglasses recommended)

I am interested to hear feedback and ideas--you can contact my office on (02) 9230 2052 or email me at [email protected].


email workers to a friend printer-friendly version latest breaking news from labornet

Search All Issues | Latest Issue | Previous Issues | Print Latest Issue

© 1999-2002 Workers Online
Workers Online is a resource for the Labour movement
provided by the Labor Council of NSW
Last Modified: 15 Nov 2005

Powered by APT Solutions
Labor Council of NSW Workers Online