The Official Organ of LaborNET
click here to view the latest edition of Workers Online
The Official Organ of LaborNET
Free home delivery
June 2003   

History: Nest of Traitors
Rowan Cahill uncovers a ripping yarn that could redefine the way we look at Australian involvement in World War II.

Interview: A Nation of Hope
Former PM Bob Hawke bemoans the demise of industrial relations but takes heart from the prospect of peace in the Middle East

Unions: National Focus
Noel Hester reports on a soap star rebellion, Howardís plans to renuclearise South Australia, more historical atrocities in the north, the redundancy test case plus more in the monthly national wrap.

Safety: The Shocking Truth
Itís every power workerís worst nightmare Ė and it happened to Adrian Ware. In a flash of voltage, his life changed forever, as Jim Marr reports.

Tribute: A Comrade Departed
From Prime Ministers to wharfies, the labour movement paid tribute to Tas Bull this week. Jim Marr was among them.

History: Working Bees
Neale Towart looks at a group of workers who got sacked so their boss could keep making the Bomb.

Education: The Big Picture
The NTEUís Dr Mike Donaldson and Tony Brown join all the dots in the current debate around higher eduction.

International: Static Labour
Ray Marcelo argues thereís another side to the recent furore over Telstraís use of cheap Indian IT contractors.

Economics: Budget And Fudge It
Frank Stilwell argues that Peter Costelloís latest budget plumbs fiscal policy to new depths.

Technology: Google and Campaigning
Labourstartís Eric Lee argues the latest weapon for campaigning could be the humble search engine.

Review: Secretary With A Difference
Looking for a new job can be hard enough, without having to worry about sadomasochistic bosses and the threat of being spanked for forgetting to cross your Ďtís, says Tara de Boehmler.

Poetry: The Minimale
The Labor Party leadership is in the news again, inspiring our resident bard David Peetz to song

Satire: Howard Calls for Senate to be Replaced by Clap-O-Meter
John Howard released a controversial policy statement today, arguing that the Senate be abolished in favour of a device measuring noise from the gallery of the House of Representatives.


Itís Our Party
Long time union watcher Nicholas Way looks at the changing dynamics between the industrial and political wings of the labour movement.

The Soapbox
Grass Roots
In his Maiden Speech, new MP Tony Burke argues that the ALPís union links are nothing to be ashamed of.

Opinion Forming Down Under
Evan Jones condemns the mainstreamís media coverage of the War on Iraq and the damage it is doing to our national psyche.

The Locker Room
Location, Re-Location!
Itís all fun and games until someone loses a club, writes Phil Doyle


To the Victors The Spoils
Revelations that private American lawyers, rather than the ILO, will rewrite the labour laws of countries levelled by the American military vindicate the warnings of those concerned by US unilateralism.


 Rail Chaos Looms

 Electrolux Blows Fuse at Fundraiser

 ACM Loosens Handcuff on Democracy

 Sick Call on Mumís Job

 Now For Industrial Shock and Awe

 Brian Miller Ė Working Class Hero

 Dynamite: Howard Handout for Rorters

 Family Case to Nurture Mothers

 Militants Lock Out Another 600

 Tipping the Turtle Ė Fijian Style

 Carr Goes Private

 Wages Blemish Sound Budget

 Westie Takes On Westfield ĎHypocrisyí

 Eleventh Hour Reprieve for Women's Centre

 Activist Notebook

 In Defence of Cuba
 The Story in General
 Thinking of America
About Workers Online
Latest Issue
Print Latest Issue
Previous Issues
Advanced Search

other LaborNET sites

Labor Council of NSW
Vic Trades Hall Council
IT Workers Alliance
Unions on LaborNET
Evatt Foundation

Labor for Refugees



The Big Picture

The NTEUís Dr Mike Donaldson and Tony Brown join all the dots in the current debate around higher eduction.


Mike Donaldson wirtes:

The higher education industry is very big business. In export dollars alone, it earns more than wheat and wool and manufacturing, and is second only to minerals.

The global market is mainly untapped. There are 40 universities in Australia. The 1,700 universities in China absorb only 10% of student demand in that country alone. The market is huge and $billions are at stake.

Global corporations operate on much longer time horizons than unions do, and have a much clearer picture of the future. For well more than a decade, they have been planning investment strategies in growth areas of the economy.

In order for them to access the higher education growth area of the economy, two key changes had to occur - capital had to turn education into a commodity and a market for higher education had to be created.

Firstly, students and their families had to be habituated into paying for their education. Education could no longer remain "free". This process was begun in 1996 by the Labor Government with the introduction of the HECS system - which is a use now pay later system of fees. It was deepened by the Conservatives who consistently drove the HECS charges up.

They also introduced "full fee" education for overseas students, while cutting down on Government funding. Overseas students pay the full cost of their education upfront plus more. Predictably, universities hurled themselves at overseas full-paying student to make up for the shortfall in Government funding. The first seeds of fully-fledged market in education were planted.

In the next step, the Government opened up full fee places to domestic students, arguing that if foreign students could buy an education in Australia, so should Australians students be able to. Currently 50% of the places in Australian universities are available to students prepared to pay over $100,000 for a degree. These people have the money but not the grades to get into university. Then they whacked HECS up to decrease the disparity between HECS places and full fee places

At the same time, underfunding has meant that there are now 33,000 Australian students who want to get into university, but for whom there is no place.

So, a market has now been created. Education now has a price, students are habituated to paying it and demand for education outstrips supply.

Into this gap, step the private corporations. Rupert Murdoch began sniffing around the industry as early as 1999, and there are now more than ten companies seeking access to this lucrative market in NSW alone.

But still there are two bodies that stand in the way of this corporate grab, and in this budget Nelson and Abbott are attempting to eliminate them; one is the power of the State Parliaments and the other is trade unions.

Firstly, since universities are created by State Acts of Parliament, the Federal Government needs to weaken their control, and one step in that process is to remove parliamentary representation from university Governing bodies. That is why I am asking that Labour Council to organise a meeting with the State Education Minister.

Secondly, the Government wants to remove the other barrier to the new market by simply banning student unions altogether, and by tying funding to the introduction to AWAs and by removing the right of higher education workers to take industrial action. Removing the right of higher education workers to take industrial action of course, will not remain peculiar to those workers or that industry, in fact the higher education industry is just the thin end of the wedge.

According to a report issued by Brendan Nelson last year,

An amendment will be made to the Workplace Relations Act to amplify the power of the Australian Industrial Relations Commission to end protected industrial action, by requiring the AIRC to take particular account of the welfare of people who are clients of health, community services or education systems, including students. (Section 8.2 Our Universities: Backing Australia's Future).

That is, the proposed changes are about reducing the rights of nearly two million Australian workers in the education, health and community services industries. Nurses, school teachers, health workers, ambulance drivers and most public servants will have their ability to take legitimate industrial action severely curtailed.

Tony Brown writes

Nelson's Budget: A Smidgen For Higher Education, Less For TAFE

The real news of the education budget is that this year universities will receive a miniscule $152m increase out of a total education budget of $4.3billion, private schools will receive more money than universities, and there are no new funds for vocational education and training, or adult education.

Brendan Nelson risks being seen as David Kemp with an earring. Beneath that smooth appearance lays the same agenda of smashing student unions, waging a battle with the NTEU over individual contracts, extending the market into higher education, and transferring money to private schools. With this budget the Commonwealth now spends more money on private schools ($A4.37billion) than it does for universities ($A4.31bilion).

Kemp's term as Minister was a failure as his narrow agenda meant that the important steps needed to upgrade Australia's universities in response to new knowledge demands went unattended. The possibility is that once again the issues of extending participation, stimulating research and fostering new learning will be ignored as the universities become a new industrial waterfront.

The sugar coating around this pill is some new targeted funds for indigenous students, an increased number of scholarships, and a small grant for regional universities. But these are distractions from the core purposes of the budget, which are to shift the cost from the state to the individual and to extend price competition into courses. The only long term benefit of this change is that the new higher student fees will go to the universities rather than the government.

De-regulating fees will extend the private school tradition into universities. The likely impact will be that universities that can, will charge as much as they are allowed for high demand courses and the other universities will be forced to either offer cut price courses to attract those the elite universities won't take, or drop the courses altogether. Inevitably this will result in a renewed two-tier university system. It won't be long before a student's future job prospects will depend as much on the campus they attended as what they learnt or are capable of.

A new waterfront?

The budget sets the ground for a new bitter industrial fight. An additional $402 million will be available over four years, IF, universities can demonstrate they have complied with the government's workplace relations policies. Universities will be 'encouraged' to introduce flexible working arrangements focussing on 'direct relationships with employees' and the government will give another $55m for this. The NTEU will either have to organise its members to resist the spread of individual workplace agreements or else abandon its successful and member-supported co-ordinated bargaining campaigns.

Yet another attack on the universities limited democratic governance will be the proviso that university councils must be restructured to reduce staff and student representation. However, as most university councils are established by Acts of State Parliaments this is likely also to be a source of dispute, this time between governments.

Vocational and adult education

But what of the 1.7 million students who attend vocational education and training (VET)? Even though there are nearly three times as many VET as university students (660,000) the budget does not provide any more money than had been previously announced. A new agreement between the Commonwealth and States worth $1.1 billion is to be negotiated and is conditional on the States agreeing to increase User Choice policies, in other words open up more funds to private providers, as well as other programs for which they will not receive sufficient funds.

For the more than 600,000 adults pursuing their studies or learning needs through the adult and community education (ACE) sector the government does not provide any additional funds at all.

More than 70% of young people do not go to university after school. Many attend TAFE, but millions say they are done with learning. Without schemes specifically targeted at encouraging adults to continue their learning the costs to them as individuals as well as to their families and society will grow and be felt in later years. In today's world the need to keep learning is vital.

This year is the first in the UN's Literacy Decade, yet over 40% of Australian adults do not have the literacy and numeracy skills needed for a sophisticated technological society. There is an urgent need to tackle these problems, yet the Budget ignores

The budget's allocations make very clear Nelson's education priorities. Those who have missed out on education as children or young adults can expect little more than crumbs from the Coalition. There is nothing in this budget to show that Nelson has much commitment to developing a broad learning society.


email workers to a friend printer-friendly version latest breaking news from labornet

Search All Issues | Latest Issue | Previous Issues | Print Latest Issue

© 1999-2002 Workers Online
Workers Online is a resource for the Labour movement
provided by the Labor Council of NSW
Last Modified: 15 Nov 2005

Powered by APT Solutions
Labor Council of NSW Workers Online