Workers Online
Workers Online
Workers Online
  Issue No 37 Official Organ of LaborNet 29 October 1999  

 --

 --

 --

Legal

Second Wave: Reith's Non-Right to Strike

By Marian Baird - Department of Industrial Relations, University of Sydney

Peter Reith has called his new laws the Workplace relations Amendment (More Jobs Better Pay) Bill 1999. If legislation is to carry these new, colloquial titles then the 'More Control, Less Freedom' Bill would be a better title.

The proposed changes control unions and workers even more tightly than at present and there is less freedom to organise and act collectively. One of the areas where this is most obvious is the 'right to strike', if it can be called that.

The freedom, or right, to strike is regarded internationally as an essential tool of labour movements, and without it their power to bargain successfully to protect and improve wages and conditions is significantly reduced. In Australia there is no absolute 'right to strike' and the government proposes to hem workers in still more.

For the last twenty years the number of strikes and the number of workers taking strike action in Australia has been declining, reaching an all time low this year. This fact hasnít stopped the federal government trying to clamp down on workersí rights still further.

The Workplace Relations Act 1996 did contain a limited right to strike when bargaining over wages and conditions for a certified agreement. But there is no lawful right to strike over issues that arise during the life of the agreement, usually a period of two years. So, for example, strikes about the allocation of overtime or the interpretation of rosters are unlawful.

Under the changes proposed in the Bill, the existing 'right to strike' is to be further restricted. To lawfully take any industrial action, including strike action, a number of procedures must be followed. The industrial action is then called ìprotected actionî.

Let's look at these procedures. The union (or a group of workers) has to ask permission to take action at least five days before they plan to take the action and a secret ballot of the members must be taken. In order to obtain the permission to hold the ballot the union must apply to the Workplace Relations Commission. The application must include the questions that are to be put to the voters, the precise nature of the intended industrial action and the day or days on which the action is to take place.

If approved the Commission will make an order for the secret ballot to be held. The ballot will be run by the Electoral Commission, or an approved balloting agent. The cost of the ballot is to be met by the applicant (ie usually the union) and 80% of it will then be refunded. For strike action to actually proceed, 50% of the eligible people must vote, and 50% must then vote in favour of the industrial action.

Even if the strike action is approved by the majority, there is no requirement for all of the voters to participate in the action (an open invitation to scabbery?). The process is time-consuming and costly, and it doesnít stop there. Assuming that a lawful strike can be organised, the unionís hands are still tied because the strike, or period of protected action, cannot last longer than 14 days. If it does, the Commission must terminate the action. So much for a right to strike!

The irony is that making it difficult to go on strike doesn't mean all's well in the workplace.

Workers can and will express their dissatisfaction in other ways. Workers may not come to work for the day, take a sickie and engage in absenteeism. They might just choose to leave their jobs, to quit, or if they canít find another job, they might just work slowly and unproductively, or as a last resort, consider sabotage. Who can blame them if they cannot express dissatisfaction in a collective and organised manner?

It is quite clearly the case that unions and their members may not want to strike at the drop of a hat. They may prefer to settle their differences with employers by bargaining, but sometimes there is no alternative. Restricting the right to strike further, as the current amendments propose, is an absolute and unnecessary attack on the rights of all workers.

This article was first published in WorkSite


------

*   View entire issue - print all of the articles!

*   Issue 37 contents

In this issue
Features
*  Republic: Yes, It's Time
Opposition leader Kim Beazley invoked the spirit of '72 when he launched the ALP's Republic campaign.
*
*  Interview: What Price a Just Republic?
Magistrate Pat O’Shane is far from happy with the republican model. But she still believes a Yes vote is her best chance for genuine constitutional reform.
*
*  Economics: Who the EFIC are you?
If you have not heard of Export Credit Agencies, don't be surprised because it seems they're not too interested in letting the public know what they do.
*
*  Unions: Old Habits Die Hard
With the release of its blue print [email protected] the ACTU seems to know where it wants to go. But again it has failed to face up to the underlying structural issues preventing it from getting there.
*
*  Legal: Second Wave: Reith's Non-Right to Strike
Peter Reith has called his new laws the Workplace relations Amendment (More Jobs Better Pay) Bill 1999. If legislation is to carry these new, colloquial titles then the ‘More Control, Less Freedom’ Bill would be a better title.
*
*  International: Wahid’s New Team
Indonesias new government is blemished by Suharto-era appointees but an advance for reform, says Indonesia’s trade unions.
*
*  History: They Fought Them on the Airwaves
Radio broadcasts were an important weapon in the long-running struggle for equal pay.
*
*  Satire: Revealed: SOCOG Reserving Gold Medals for Tattersalls
The scandal over the secret allotment of premium tickets for the 2000 Olympics escalated today with the news that members of Sydney’s elite Tattersall’s Club will receive Gold Medals without actually competing.
*
*  Review: What The Age Wouldn’t Print
Some time before Monday 18 October, Age editor Michael Gawenda saw red and then got out his blue pencil. An article, heavily critical of Robert Manne, written by Overland editor Ian Syson, was pulled by Gawenda.
*

News
»  Ticket Machines Used to Spy on Workers
*
»  Vics Look North for IR Inspiration
*
»  Union Construct New Buildings for East Timor
*
»  Holy Sheet! Dirty Olympic Linen to Cost Jobs
*
»  Lunchtime Sizzles as Workers Burn
*
»  Carnivale Changes An Assault On Working Class Migrants
*
»  Child Carers Fight Christmas Lay-Offs
*
»  Spiderman Strikes as Women Sink Second Wave
*
»  Big Rail Fine Just Tip of Iceberg
*
»  Micky Mouse Union Blocked by Commission
*
»  Where Were You on November 6?
*
»  POSITION VACANT: MEAA Inquiry Desk Officer
*

Columns
»  Guest Report
*
»  Sport
*
»  Trades Hall
*
»  Piers Watch
*

Letters to the editor
»  An X for President - Feedback
*
»  Republican Soapbox
*
»  Education an Asset for All
*

What you can do

Notice Board
- Check out the latest events

Latest Issue

View entire latest issue
- print all of the articles!

Previous Issues

Subject index

Search all issues

Enter keyword(s):
  


Workers Online - 2nd place Labourstart website of the year


BossWatch


Wobbly Radio



[ Home ][ Notice Board ][ Search ][ Previous Issues ][ Latest Issue ]

© 1999-2000 Labor Council of NSW

LaborNET is a resource for the labour movement provided by the Labor Council of NSW

URL: http://workers.labor.net.au/37/c_historicalfeature_strike.html
Last Modified: 15 Nov 2005

[ Privacy Statement | Disclaimer | Credits ]

LaborNET is proudly created, designed and programmed by Social Change Online for the Labor Council of NSW

 *LaborNET*

 Labor Council of NSW

[Workers Online]

[Social Change Online]