|
Issue No. 295 | 17 February 2006 |
Please Explain
Interview: Court's in Session Industrial: Whose Choices? Politics: Peter's Principles Environment: TINA or Greener? History: Its Not Just Handshakes and Aprons International: US Locks out Jose' Bove Education: No AWA - No Job Culture: Jesus was a Long-Grass Man Review: Charlie the Serf
Conscience II - RU4 Aussie Jobs? Online Porkies Spark Class Action Captain Cook Discovers WorkChoices STOP PRESS - 262 Day Strike Set To Finish Memo Costa: Remember Your Roots Filipinos Pay for Packed House
The Soapbox The Locker Room Parliament
The Black GST
Labor Council of NSW |
News Online Porkies Spark Class Action
Individual workers are suing the University for $33,000 each on the basis that they were provided 'false and misleading information' about the Australian Workplace Agreement.
Maurice Blackburn Cashman are running the case on behalf of an National Tertiary Education union member, Jeremy Smith, and several hundred other workers who were offered the contracts. NTEU Victorian secretary Matthew McGowan, who is backing the action, says the case - due on court next week - is a new approach for unions in an environment where unions have fewer rights to enforce industrial agreements. The approach has been masterminded by MBC partner Josh Bornstein, who was also the architect of the successful legal strategy in the 1998 Waterfront Dispute. At the centre of the action is an email the University's Vice Chancellor Kerry Cox sent to employees last December claiming there would be no loss of conditions or job security for those who signed the AWAs being offered. But the workers will argue the final contracts provided inferior redundancy entitlements for both academic and general staff, while almost all of the protections available to staff facing dismissal, suspension, or disciplinary action under the certified agreement have been removed.
The AWA also removed the ability for the Australian Industrial Relations Commission to arbitrate disputes. If successful, McGowan says the workers will argue that penalties of $33,000 for each breach of the federal workplace relations Act should go directly to the workers.
|
Search All Issues | Latest Issue | Previous Issues | Print Latest Issue |
© 1999-2002 Workers Online |
|