|
Issue No. 275 | 05 August 2005 |
Iemma�s Dilemmas
Interview: On Holiday Unions: One Day Longer Industrial: Never Mind the Bollocks Politics: Spun Out Economics: If the Grog Don't Get You .... History: Taking a Stand International: The Split Legal: Pushing the Friendship Poetry: Simple Subtractions Review: Sydney Trashed
Discriminating Centrelink on Charges Taxpayers to Fund Advertising Orgy Constituents Don�t Trust Andrews Howard Steamroller Hits Building Sites
Parliament The Soapbox The Locker Room International Postcard
AFL-CIO Not The Only War Be Afraid Frame Up We Love Morris ANew Development A Readers Suggestion
Labor Council of NSW |
News Andrews Provokes Showdown
Andrews ducked those questions at last Thursday's meeting with state and territory IR Ministers, setting the scene for a legal showdown over his radical agenda. NSW Minister, John Della Bosca, said "on the evidence available" a joint High Court challenge to the Commonwealth's use of Corporations powers seemed inevitable. "Alarmingly," Della Bosca said, Andrews had also refused to commit to circulating specifics of his workplace rewrite before it was tabled in Parliament. Della Bosca called the federal IR approach an "arrogant abuse of power". "The Commonwealth Government failed to give any assurances that its industrial relations changes would not reduce the wages, entitlements or lifestyles of Australian workers and their families," he said. State and Territory Ministers said they refused Andrews' bid to hand over their IR systems after considering modelling showing families stood to lose thousands of dollars from the proposed changes. They went into the meeting brandishing claims that the difference between existing entitlements and the Commonwealth's proposed minimum standards could see .. - nurses lose up to $18,688 a year - restaurant workers down by more than $700 - cleners lose up to $966 per annum Andrews refused to provide the following requested assurances .. - that there would be no hostile takeover of state systems - that AWAs would not offer less take home pay than received under federal or state awards - that a fair minimum wage would be set by a truly independent authority - that there would be a comprehensive safety net - that there would be an independent umpire with dispute settling powers - that there would be special protections for vulnerable workers, including contractors Della Bosca the requests were based on evidence that removal of minimum standards such as leave loading, penalties and allowances would "devastate" family budgets.
|
Search All Issues | Latest Issue | Previous Issues | Print Latest Issue |
© 1999-2002 Workers Online |
|