The Official Organ of LaborNET
click here to view the latest edition of Workers Online
The Official Organ of LaborNET
Free home delivery
Issue No. 259 15 April 2005  

Roosting Chooks
It wasnít that long ago that John Howard was the great Conservative leader who wanted to remake Australia in his own image, defending the monarchy, beating up gay mums and attacking the ABC.


Interview: [email protected]
Labor's Penny Wong has the job of getting more people into the workplace and keeping companies honest. In her spare time ....

Unions: State of the Union
Unions NSW secretary John Robertson unveils the annual survey of attitudes of workers to their jobs, thier lives and the union.

Industrial: Fashion Accessories
Jim Marr unpacks the unlikely claim of a suburban house to be considered the New Mecca of the New Right Ö

Legal: Leg Before Picket
Chris White looks at how the federal industrial changes will impact on the basic right to strike.

Politics: Business Welfare Brats
Neale Towart asks why the only form of legitmate welfare seems to be going to the top end of town.

Health: Cannabis Controversy
Zoe Reynolds looks at how drug and alcohol testing is leading to some addled outcomes.

Economics: Debt, Deficit, Downturn
As the indicators head south, Frank Stilwell wonders whether it is the way we do economics that is to blame.

History: Politics In The Pubs
Phil Doyle reports on the increasingly-popular Struggles, Scabs and Schooners day out.

Review: Three Bob's Worth
Doing their best Margaret and David, Tara de Boehmler and Tim Brunero have different takes on the new Australian flick Three Dollars.

Poetry: Do The Slowly Chokie
Workers Online bard David Peetz teaches how workers to dance to Howard's industrial laws.


 Freedom From Choice

 Hostile Takeover - Can Howard Do It?

 Premier Sues Miners

 Vanstone Shows Brickieís Cleavage

 Sparkies Refine Safety Tactics

 Ten Cent Deal Cuts Beards

 Kiwis Vote for Flight

 Death Penalty No Deterrent

 Costa Railroads Jobs

 Greystanes Soiled

 Aussies in Ivy league Battle

 Drivers Shake the Cage

 Employers Come Clean

 Big Call in Newcastle

 Bosses Back Gaol for Cowboys

 Activistís Whatís On


The Soapbox
Notes From a Laneway
Mental Health Workers Alliance member Toby Raeburn shares a week on the frontline.

The Locker Room
War, Plus The Shooting
The Socceroos arenít their own worst enemy after all, or so says Phil Doyle

Life Imitates Art
The jokes have been around for some time about the economic rationalist's approach to the orchestra, writes Evan Jones.

The Westie Wing
Ian West takes the secret passage out of Macquarie Street to deliver his take on NSW Parliamentary Committees and other goings on.

 Adler Should Be Hung
About Workers Online
Latest Issue
Print Latest Issue
Previous Issues
Advanced Search

other LaborNET sites

Labor Council of NSW
Vic Trades Hall Council
IT Workers Alliance
Unions on LaborNET
Evatt Foundation

Labor for Refugees



Roosting Chooks

It wasnít that long ago that John Howard was the great Conservative leader who wanted to remake Australia in his own image, defending the monarchy, beating up gay mums and attacking the ABC.

One of the targets of the early days of his government was the High Court, which he accused of being activist for having the temerity to invoke the external affairs power to rule that the blackfellas had been occupants of the continent before Captain Cook sailed over the horizon.

Howard and his minions systematically went about intimidating the Court, running a coordinated campaign to stem its perceived 'activism' by appointing a succession of black letter, conservative judges who would read doen the Commonwealth's powers.

Fast forward and Howard, the reinvented radical, has a different agenda - an aggressive and hostile move into states' rights, fuelled by a Senate majority that gives him unbridled power.

The wish list is growing by the day, ministers in education, health and defamation are all rubbing their hands and wondering how they can extend their influence.

But this new Radicalism is centring on the hostile takeover of state industrial relations laws, under the auspices of the Commonwealth's power to regulate Corporations.

This brazen play is the constitutional equivalent of a ram raid, using the Corporations power to bust through the shopfront of state's rights.

In effect the Howard government is saying that it's power to make laws about corporations totally overrides its existing constitutional limits on industrial relations, rendering an entire section of Constitution irrelevant.

While the balance of state-federal rights is hardly a barbeque stopping topic, there is a breed of lawyers who get very excited about the issues.

Lawyers like Greg Craven, a mild-mannered constitutional expert and former Victorian solicitor-general who let fly with an absolute spray about the Howard government's new modus operandi.

Here's a flavour what he had to say to Maxine McKew on the 7.30 Report:

"(I) think that conservatives have always understood that federalism is a form of insurance; that you divide power to make absolutely certain that you don't get a situation where any one person or entity controls the entire policy agenda and to make certain that if a particular person gets into a position of power, they do not have all the instruments of power at their beck and call."

"There may well be any number of reasons why you might want to pursue industrial relations reform.

"What you don't do is pursue it at the price of the constitution, because our federal constitution - which has worked, I think, brilliantly, as the Prime Minister keeps telling us, for 100 years - has always worked on the basis that you divide and balance power to make sure that power is not abused, and quite frankly, that is bigger than anything on the policy agenda, even including industrial relations."

If you were to pigeon hole Craven it would be along the following lines - conservative, black letter, not given to judicial activism ... Hold on, Johnnie, isn't this the job description you've been putting out for the High Court?

And here's the rub, in bludgeoning the High Court over native title and the expansive interrpetation of the external affairs powers, Howard now has the sort of court that will think long and hard before trashing the fundamental principles of federalism.

Our system of government is based on the lines between commonwealth and state powers; we can argue about where the line lies, but there is a line to be drawn. If a hostile takeover of state industrial powers doesn't cross that line, in comes very close.

One thing is clear, with this type of High Court, we should not be giving up on the state industrial relations system just yet.

Peter Lewis



*   View entire issue - print all of the articles!

*   Issue 259 contents

email workers to a friend printer-friendly version latest breaking news from labornet

Search All Issues | Latest Issue | Previous Issues | Print Latest Issue

© 1999-2002 Workers Online
Workers Online is a resource for the Labour movement
provided by the Labor Council of NSW
Last Modified: 15 Nov 2005

Powered by APT Solutions
Labor Council of NSW Workers Online