|
Issue No. 258 | 08 April 2005 |
Be My Guest
Interview: Australia@Work Unions: State of the Union Industrial: Fashion Accessories Legal: Leg Before Picket Politics: Business Welfare Brats Health: Cannabis Controversy Economics: Debt, Deficit, Downturn History: Politics In The Pubs Review: Three Bob's Worth Poetry: Do The Slowly Chokie
Sweat Shop Taxes MLC�s Patience Cops Strengthen Thin Blue Line Building Families Pocket $15 Million
The Soapbox The Locker Room Culture Parliament
Labor Council of NSW |
News Wattyl Lacks Colour
Since staff sprung a senior manager describing 350 strikers as "blobs" in an internal email, the company has been in whitewash mode.
"They have been back-pedalling furiously," LHMU assistant secretary, Jo-anne Schofield, reported. "They claim it was a typo which our members don't believe. We're running a contest for the best explanation of what it was they actually meant." The manager, based in the company's Ryde head office, gave instructions on "how to prevent a blob from entering the site". However, a Workers Online search of industrial insults painted the manager's effort as both unoriginal and lame. The best NSW authority on the subject was an IRC decision, handed down in 1999, on an unjustified dismissal case, arising from a punch-up at BHP Steel. Commissioner, James Redman, ruled the term that provoked the fisticuffs - "two-faced c..." would rate nine on a scale of 10. He reasoned "scab", when applied to a strike breaker, would attract a perfect score. On this scale, Commissioner Redman said, "poofter" would fall at the lower end. LHMU members returned to work on Wednesday after a three-day strike at five sites around the country in support of EBA claims. They are seeking annual five percent wage movements and improved redundancy provisions after Wattyl tried to gloss over plans to shut its Blacktown operation which employs 120 workers. "We met in December and they assured us no decisions had been taken but, two days later, workers discovered a costed proposal to close Blacktown," Schofield said. "That proposal included reasons on why the company should play its cards close to its chest in negotiations with workers."
|
Search All Issues | Latest Issue | Previous Issues | Print Latest Issue |
© 1999-2002 Workers Online |
|