|
Issue No. 246 | 12 November 2004 |
How It Comes To This
Interview: The Reich Stuff Economics: Crime and Punishment Environment: Beyond The Wedge International: The End Of The Lucky Country Safety: Tests Fail Tests Politics: Labo(u)r Day Human Rights: Arabian Lights History: Labour's Titan Review: Foxy Fiasco Poetry: Then I Saw The Light
The Locker Room The Soapbox Parliament
Labor Council of NSW |
News Cold Comfort for Scientists
The Department of Employment and Workplace Relations has iced a negotiated pay rise that would have given them average increases of four percent a year. The department, acting of government policy, rejected the agreed settlement between workers, based in Tasmania and Antarctica, and the Australian Antarctic Division. CPSU spokesman, Simon Cocker, said third-party intervention in their bargaining had left staff "angered and bewildered". They have responded with a blizzard of emails to Antarctic Division bosses, demanding that they reject the interference and honour their agreement. DEWR's action followed similar interferences with CPSU-negotiated agreements for workers employed by the Australian Electoral Commission and Food Standards Australia and New Zealand, earlier in the year. Both those groups of workers eventually rolled the federal government's pay rise watchdog. Crocker said the basis of DEWR's rejection of the Antarctic Division agreement was "technical" and "ridiculous". It's bleat centres on the date on which the increase is measured from. It argues, with a December kick-off, workers will effectively receive 5.3 percent for one year, while the CPSU contends the figure must measured from the October expiry date of the old agreement. That methodology would give two four percent increases, around the public service average. DEWR's argument appears to fly in face of its own figures. In publishing annual average wage movement, its calculations are based on what it calls a Nominal Expiry Date. Effectively, it measures movements from the date of the previous agreement's expiry. "DEWR uses this measure for its published calculations," Cocker said. "What our people are asking is why doesn't four percent equal four percent when it comes to the Antarctic Division."
|
Search All Issues | Latest Issue | Previous Issues | Print Latest Issue |
© 1999-2002 Workers Online |
|