|
Issue No. 222 | 28 May 2004 |
The New Radicals
Interview: Machine Man Unions: Testing Times Bad Boss: Freespirit Haunts Internet Unions: Badge of Honour National Focus: Noel's World Economics: Safe Refuge International: Global Abuse History: The Honeypot Review: Death And The Barbarians Poetry: Who Wants to be a Millionaire?
Fight Breaks Out of Schoolyard "Back Off" Call To Death Inquiry Sweet Box-all for Ballot Bureaucrats Federal Muzzle for Shareholders
The Soapbox The Soapbox Sport Politics Postcard
Labor Council of NSW |
Editorial The New Radicals
George W Bush put himself forward to the American people as a 'compassionate conservative'; John Howard is the world leader of the conservative club and they all bow down to the high priestess of conservatism, Dame Maggie Thatcher. But the economic, global and social policies our American leader and his Antipodean consort are currently promoting are anything but conservative. As David McKnight points out in this month's 'Soapbox', the essence of conservatism is a doctrine that values tradition, institutions and the existing rules as the basis of society's foundations. To conservatives, the case for any change carries a heavy onus and tends to be embraced, at best, incrementally. This stance made Conservatives the natural enemies of radical Socialists in the last century and it was this stand-off that helped define our 'Left-Right' political divide This conservatism has little to do with the zealous and radical doctrine of the neo-conservatives like Bush and Howard. They are the champions of economic deregulation - from trade policy to the labour laws -= their mission is cut back on the rules and institutions that have governed the market since the industrial revolution. They are the warriors who have bypassed the United Nations to construct a New World Order based on the doctrine of pre-emption to protect US interests. And they are the political practitioners who have been prepared to wedge their societies on issues like race, refugees and the institution of marriage for their own short-term advantage. The impact of these leaders on the world has been as radical as any plaid-shirted revolutionary; it might hurt us to admit it but they have changed the world. Perversely, the modern day conservatives, in its truest meaning, are the green Party's that challenge most fundamentally the radical market economics in a bid to conserve our natural environment. As for social democratic parties like the ALP? They are in the difficult positioning of defining themselves in an era when old divides between Left and Right, Conservative and Radical do not mean much any more. As McKnight points out, the beginning of this process is to dispense with the doctrine and look for values that drive us to engage in politics for the first time: the desire for stronger more cohesive communities, a better future for our kids, a world where markets work for us not the other way around. It is a political vision that is both Transformative and perversely, Conservative. If we can translate it into a new politics, then the early years of the new millennium will not have been suffered in vain. Peter Lewis Editor
|
Search All Issues | Latest Issue | Previous Issues | Print Latest Issue |
© 1999-2002 Workers Online |
|