|
Issue No. 203 | 14 November 2003 |
Beyond the Workplace
Interview: Union for the Dispossessed Unions: Joel's Law National Focus: Spring Carnival Bad Boss: Fina and Fiends Industrial: The Price of War Economics: Who's Got What History: Containing Discontent Review: An Honourable Wally Poetry: The Colours of Discontent
Hardie Shareholders Face Death Road Workers Swing Left-Right Blows Developers To Kick Transport Can Cleaners Mop Up Contracts Mess Unions Set To Stand Up To Bullies Jack Thompson Headlines Launch
The Soapbox Sport Politics Postcard
Super Solidarity Perils Of Pauline Put A PM On The Barbie Tom Holds Water
Labor Council of NSW |
News ACTU Names Its Price
Announcing the 2004 Minimum Wages Case, ACTU Secretary Greg Combet said the claim was an opportunity to help reverse the growing inequality of incomes in Australian society. For full time workers, the claim would boost the Minimum Wage from $448.40 per week to $475 per week, before tax. The claim is the next step in the unions' wages strategy adopted at ACTU Congress in August, which set a target to progressively increase the Federal Minimum Wage to $14.50 an hour or $550 a week. Combet says that to prevent further increases in inequality, debt and to address the crisis of low pay in Australia, substantial increases were needed in the incomes of low paid workers. "More than half of award workers earn less than $15 per hour. Many cannot afford basic household expenses. It is no surprise that Australians are being forced into record levels of household and credit card debt," Combet says. "Most award workers are women in part time and casual jobs. Their work often entails serving the needs of others in the hospitality, retail, health, childcare and community sectors. They deserve and need a decent pay rise next year." Under the claim, award workers would receive an average annual pay rise of 4.5 per cent, compared with 6.2% in Average Weekly Earnings in the year to August and 7.3 per cent for CEOs in the year to June, according to this month's Australian Financial Review's annual salary survey. Combet called on the Federal Government to break with tradition and support the ACTU's claim next year to help improve the living standards of the lowest paid workers. The Howard Government has opposed the ACTU's Minimum Wages Case every year since coming to office, despite a robust economy. If the Government had had its way since 1996, workers on the minimum wage would be $35 a week worse off than they are now. Combet says that the ACTU's claim is economically responsible and would have a negligible impact on employment levels. The claim is costed to add 0.1 per cent to economy-wide earnings and 0.08 per cent to inflation. The Australian Industrial Relations Commission will hear the case next year.
|
Search All Issues | Latest Issue | Previous Issues | Print Latest Issue |
© 1999-2002 Workers Online |
|