|
Issue No. 172 | 28 March 2003 |
Vale: Rule of Law
Poetry: If I Were a Rich Man Interview: League of Nations Industrial: 20/20 Hindsight Organising: On The Buses Unions: National Focus History: The Banner Room International: The Slaughter Continues Legal: A Legal Case For War? Culture: Singing For The People Review: The Hours Poetry: I Wanna Bomb Saddam Satire: Diuretic Makes Warne's Excuses Look Thin
Unions Condemn Protest Violence Hospitals Pick Sweatshops Over Chain Gangs New Faces Part of Labor ‘Rejuvenation’ Test Case – UK 26, Australia 0 Uncle Sam and the Union Busters Calling All Artists – May Day Poster Comp Nipping Surveillance in the Bud Forced Labour Prevails Despite Sanctions
The Soapbox The Locker Room Guest Report Seduction Bosswatch
Tom's Tantie Shameless Extremists Barbarians at the Gate More War Comment Back-Slapping Bob
Labor Council of NSW |
News Cole’s Bad Medicine
Nurses Union national secretary, Jill Iliffe, warned that Australians would face reduced health care or increased taxes if Commission recommendations on pattern bargaining become law. Commissioner Terence Cole's key recommendations, released this week, read like Liberal Party IR policy and nurses will oppose any move to revisit a wish-list already rejected by the Senate. Cole, largely acting on the evidence of shonky employers, has proposed draconian restrictions on the rights of building unions to recruit, organise, take industrial action, or defend health and safety standards. At the centre of his agenda, though, is an attack on pattern bargaining, a long-standing target of Workplace Relations Minister Tony Abbott. "It would be a disaster for nurses and a disaster for the health system," Iliffe told Workers Online. "The cost of negotiating separate agreements at each establishment would be prohibitive for us, and the health system as well. Our employers pattern bargain because it is practical and cost effective. "If employers are prepared to pattern bargain then they should be allowed to. It is one of the things Government should leave to the market." Iliffe said her union would lobby strongly to block Cole's recommendation. She predicted support from employers, the health department and community - "I am sure the general public doesn't want their taxes spent on needless negotiations rather than healthcare". She said teachers, police and other service workers would be similarly disadvantaged by the proposal. Unsurprisingly, given the evidence presented and the evidence withheld, Cole has recommended a string of building industry specific changes, including an Australian Building and Construction Commission empowered to investigate and prosecute breaches of the law. Similar bodies established by this Government - the OEA and Building Industry Task Force - have both been lashed by worker representatives as politically-tainted and biased against unions. Cole wants fines of up to $20,000 for individual workers breaking industrial laws and $100,000 for their organisations, and provision to ban individuals, found to have broken the law, from holding union office. He has made hundreds of findings of unlawful conduct against Building Industry Unions and their members. The first three, against NSW unions, give a flavour of the level of illegality uncovered. CFMEU organisers Dan Murphy and Lincoln Fryer are both found to have failed "to notify the occupier of the premises of his presence as soon as was reasonably practicable". The third unlawful finding was that Phillip Smith "stopped work on the site and held discussions with employees during working hours outside of meal-time or other break times". Cole found nothing to back claims of widespread corruption and standover tactics with which Abbott launched the $60 million exercise. The closest he came was reporting the extortion of $460,000 from a string of sub-contractors by star commission witnesses Craig Bates and Martin Warner. Their activities had been uncovered by the CFMEU who punted both men years before the Commission came into being, earning the praise of police. Despite reporting massive tax evasion by industry employers, Cole did not make a single finding of tax evasion against any building industry employer anywhere in Australia. He conceded the importance of health and safety in an industry claiming around 50 workers' lives a year, and recommended "attitudinal change". Iliffe lashed the Commission for its failure to deal with health and safety, or the protection of entitlements, in its public hearings. With the Labor Party and Greens having already rejected support for a Cole driven return to Peter Reith's second wave of industrial reforms, the Democrats are central to Abbott's hopes. With their party in disarray they will be susceptible to pressure from Abbott that refusal to support hardline legislation could trigger an early election.
|
Search All Issues | Latest Issue | Previous Issues | Print Latest Issue |
© 1999-2002 Workers Online |
|