|
Issue No. 171 | 21 March 2003 |
Shock and Awe
Poetry: If I Were a Rich Man Interview: League of Nations Industrial: 20/20 Hindsight Organising: On The Buses Unions: National Focus History: The Banner Room International: The Slaughter Continues Legal: A Legal Case For War? Culture: Singing For The People Review: The Hours Poetry: I Wanna Bomb Saddam Satire: Diuretic Makes Warne's Excuses Look Thin
Peace Marchers Warn Off Provocateurs Gap, Target Pay Sweatshop Dues Telstra Dotty Over Witching Hour Lawyers Push Super Class Action Fair Clothing Activists Take Stock
The Soapbox The Locker Room Guest Report Seduction Bosswatch
Viva Le Imperialists! The First Casualty Righteous indignation Dead Right Calling All Libs If George W Bush was an Australian Citizen...
Labor Council of NSW |
Letters to the Editor The First Casualty
Dear Editor, Truth is the first casualty in war. The PM 's speech for war was massive spin, the Emperor's new clothes. First, what is not admitted is a key reason for the invasion: the US's geo-political interests to dominate the middle-east region and Iraq oil reserves. This was not mentioned. Bush's right wing neo-conservative strategist's assert this as the US's real aim. When they say American involvement in Iraq is "not about oil," they are responding to charges that they are only going after profits for their oil companies. The war is not about revenues from oil - the profits will only be a side-effect. What the war is really about is US economic interests and dominance geo-politically of Iraq and the middle-east. This in their imperial world-view is both non-negotiable and based almost entirely on access to cheap oil. The US has some access to Saudi Arabia oil but they want for the next 30 years is to control access to Iraq's massive oil reserves some 432 billion barrels. Secondly, the PM did not give convincing reasons under international law to bomb and invade Iraq. Iraq has not attacked Australia and there is no evidence that any attack is imminent. The Security Council did not authorise the use of force against Iraq. Without express authorisation from the Security Council the Australian government is not entitled to use force against Iraq and is in breach of international law. It is a green light for any country to conduct war unilaterally, outside of the framework of the United Nations role in authorising and limiting the use of force. The dangers with such a move are very serious. The current law-based international order is replaced with a much more permissive and dangerous environment, where states need only claim that they face an imminent threat to start a unilateral pre-emptive war. With the United States, Australia and UK exercising this "right", on what basis can it be denied to Pakistan, India, Israel, Iran, North Korea, China, Indonesia or indeed any country? Bush's Military-Industrial Empire is out of control with this pre-emptive attack. Which country is next to be attacked by the US with our PM going along? Peace is everyone's business. As citizens we have a duty and a Constitutional right to express our political opposition strongly and protest. Chris White
|
Search All Issues | Latest Issue | Previous Issues | Print Latest Issue |
© 1999-2002 Workers Online |
|