|
Issue No. 151 | 06 September 2002 |
Looking for the Light
Interview: Packing a Punch Bad Boss: Basher Takes Back Passage Unions: Five Star Shafting Economics: TINA � Rest In Peace International: Against Bush's "War on Terrorism" Environment: Saving the World History: A Radical Scribe Poetry: With A Little Help From My Friend Satire: Colonel Gaddafi Promotes Himself to General Review: Workplace Dictatorship
Cole Comfort: I�m Not Biased Grassroots Drives Safety Campaign Deloittes Curry Favour on Sub-Continent Rail Workers Buck Individual Contract Wage Bribe Bush Regenerators Weed Out Dodgy Deal Hairdresser Wins Fight For Wage Justice Cabin Crews Argue for �Safety in Numbers� �Slave Labour� In Insurance Industry Beattie Plods into Risky Territory
The Soapbox The Locker Room Week in Review Bosswatch Women
Charity Begins At Home
Labor Council of NSW |
Editorial Looking for the Light
Former Hawke and Keating Minister Gary Punch's contribution to the reform debate this week should have been unremarkable: unions are the vital link between the ALP and the shopfloor and that it is in the political wing's long-term interest. To ensure the movement thrives. That it seems so original says much about the attitude of Labor's political class. To them 'attitudes to the union movement' is just a line item in the opinion polling that these days passes as ideology. As Punch points out, the task for Labor MPs should be twofold: helping set a climate for unions to organise and resisting the Tories' attempts to monster the movement. One of the saddest factors of the Royal Commission into the Building Industry has been the almost uniform silence from Labor MPs in the wake of the remarkable political attack on its industrial wing. It's as if ALP members accept the underlying premise of the Commission rather than view it as a set of loaded dice. With the limited exception of Robert McClelland, the silence has been deafening; we cannot recall a single MP even taking the time to view the proceedings for themselves. It's like Tampa with a Hard Hat: political timidity means that now the tables are turning and real issues of bias are being raised in the courts, Labor is in no position to take the political opportunity on offer. It's the perennial risk of white bread politics - don't stand for anything and then watch the issues of principle sail by. While there are obvious short-term benefits in this risk-free strategy; there are also obvious long-term risks. Which is really what Punch is talking about. If Labor doesn't keep a strong tie to the shop floor - both traditional and emerging - what does it stand for? And if it doesn't have the unions as this link, what is there except opinion polls and focus groups to guide them. The point about Labor's Light on the Hill was not that it was a campfire that could be used, then packed up and lit somewhere else more convenient; it was a beacon to give labour politics a direction and sense of integrity.
If the accepted wisdom is that Labor has lost its way the question should not be - where do we go now? - but - how do we get back on track? Peter Lewis Editor
|
Search All Issues | Latest Issue | Previous Issues | Print Latest Issue |
© 1999-2002 Workers Online |
|