|
Issue No. 149 | 23 August 2002 |
Our Historical Mission
Interview: Something Smells Cole-Watch: Credibility Crisis Unions: Union Cities Industrial: Lib Men Gang Up Against Working Mums History: Eureka! East Timor: Don�t Rob Their Future Review: Black Chicks Say It All Poetry: Self Regulation
Cole to Hear of Criminal Takeover Conspiracy ANZ Fined Over Freedom Of Speech Breach Qantas Union's Gorilla Tactics Shearers Black Ban Their Hall Of Fame Democrats Fire Shot for Workers Teachers Walk Out At Aust College of Technology Airport Security Worker Spat At And Assaulted CBA Workers Say Enough Is Enough Doco Dishes Dirt On Howard�s Gas Wrangle
The Soapbox The Locker Room Postcard Week in Review Bosswatch
Susan's Soccer Outrage
Labor Council of NSW |
Industrial Lib Men Gang Up Against Working Mums
******************** John Howard, Peter Costello, John Anderson, Nick Minchin and Tony Abbott have all attacked proposals before Federal Sex Discrimination Commissioner Pru Goward's maternity leave inquiry. A common theme in the chorus of criticism from the top of the Government is the claim that paid maternity leave for working women would "discriminate" against women who are not in the workforce. Instead of paid leave based on women's income, the Prime Minister has floated the idea of a much lower welfare-style maternity payment to all mothers. Mr Howard's claims of "discrimination" make no sense. Firstly, maternity leave payments, like all employment benefits such as wages, annual leave or sick pay, are of course only available to people in the workforce. For Mr Howard to argue against paid maternity leave because it "discriminates" against non-working women is as silly as to argue that annual leave or sick leave payments should be abolished because they "discriminate" against the unemployed. Secondly, introducing paid maternity leave for working women in no way prevents or hinders Governments from also providing adequate family support to women who are not in the workforce. Of course all Australian women deserve adequate support from Government policies to enhance their family choices, whether or not they are in the workforce. Many women fall into both categories at different stages of their lives, as they move in or out of the workforce while balancing their careers and family responsibilities. A number of European nations have introduced a family payment to allow choice in child care of older babies and toddlers, but all have maintained long periods of paid maternity leave as well. Mr Howard is ignoring the advice of his reputed family policy guru, Catherine Hakim of the London School of Economics, who wrote recently: "I do not suggest that policy makers should choose between maternity leave rights and a home-care allowance. Social policy should no longer be seen as a zero sum game." Mr Howard's plan for a welfare-style payment to all mothers has been estimated to deliver anything from around $50 to $200 a week - well below the levels needed by many working women to meet ongoing financial commitments. Maternity leave would remain an economically impossible choice for most working families. By comparison, the ACTU's 14-week maternity leave scheme proposed to the Goward inquiry would provide full pay to 87% of Australian working women. Women who earn up to average weekly earnings would receive full income replacement. Higher-paid women would have their payment capped at average earnings ($897 per week) but employers would be free to further supplement the payments. Paid maternity leave and a decent family payments system are affordable for Australia now. The Federal Government is this year spending $19.3 billion on family measures, including the baby bonus, childcare benefits and family tax payments. The impact of many of these measures is regressive and unfair and in need of review. The ACTU's maternity leave scheme would be funded jointly by the Commonwealth (at less cost than the current baby bonus) and by an employer levy (of less than $1-a-week per employee). Small business employees would be paid the leave, but it is possible that small business employers would not have to pay the levy. The Federal Government should use the Goward inquiry to make a real difference to the lives of Australian families. But John Howard's small change solution will offer working women no room for new choices.
|
Search All Issues | Latest Issue | Previous Issues | Print Latest Issue |
© 1999-2002 Workers Online |
|