|
Issue No. 139 | 07 June 2002 |
With Prejudice
Interview: Class Action Safety: A Mother's Tale Unions: The Hottest Seat in Town International: Defensive Enterprise Economics: A Super Deal? History: A Radical Life Media: Cross Purposes Review: When the Force Is Unconscious Poetry: Wouldn't It Be Loverly
Grieving Mum Turns Cole Around Hamberger Grilled Over AWA Scam Government Shrugs Off Death Sentence Charge Action To Pay Foreign Crew Aussie Wages Birds Get More Protection Than Workers Budget Delivers - But Not For DOCS Statewide Ban On Grain Loading Howard Soft On Organised Crime? UN Honours Building Union Drugs Program Award-Winning Poet Wins Right To Write Mahathir Told to Release Labour Activisits Horta Backs Western Sahara Independence
The Soapbox The Locker Room Bosswatch Week in Review
Robbo's Rave Latham Ad Nauseum Our Home Is Girt By Wire Hands Off Hooligans!
Labor Council of NSW |
Week in Review The Black Letter
The Federal Court delivers controversial Immigration Minister Philip Ruddock a curt "please explain" in the wake of repeated attacks on the judiciary. The court's most senior judges say his politically-driven rhetoric could be read as an attempt to pressure them, raising the fundamental issue of separation of powers. Meanwhile, the Cole Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry, henceforth known at the Inquisition, opens in Sydney with widely-reported claims that people swear on building sites. ............... While The Inquisition hammers away at its pet theory that workers should compete individually in a free labour market, claims of electricity price rigging sparked by the first cold snap of winter, pass through to the keeper. A detailed analysis of a price hike from $40 a megawatt hour to $6000 is passed to the ACCC. Under toughened eligibility rules Government expects to carve $751 million out of the pockets of welfare beneficiaries over the next four years, figures reveal. Meanwhile, at The Inquisition, CFMEU state secretary Andrew Ferguson confesses to having been a university student but, under cross examination, is unable to recall chapter and verse of a thesis he wrote more than 20 years ago. .............. Millions of dollars spent tarting up outback detention centres in the days preceeding a visit by UN inspectors appears to have been wasted when the Government is sternly rebuked by a group which includes international jurists. The UN expresses disgust at Australia's mandatory detention system, describing the Howard Government policy of locking up asylum seekers for long periods as a gross abuse of human rights. Meanwhile, the organisation responsible for the establishment of The Inquistion, has something of an identity crisis. A senior officer of the Office of Employment Advocate fronts The Inquisition, not representing the office you understand but in a personal capacity. He claims building workers make life difficult for the OEA and doesn't disagree when an inquisitor suggests the office has been rendered "impotent". Makes you wonder why he didn't represent the OEA in the first place. Once a private investigaor, always a private investigator, maybe? .............. On a day when lawyers prepare another attempt to force the Government to come clean over its 1998 watefront dispute dealings, hidden away from repeated FOI requests, Foreign Affairs Minister, Alexander Downer, rubbishes the afore-mentioned UN findings. "We do not run off to the UN asking how Australia should be run," Downer tells Parliament. Giving as good as he gets, UN delegation head Justice Louis Joinet, says criminals get a better deal than asylum seekers under the Howard regime. Meanwhile, union pressure forces The Inquisition to give some airtime to the issue of building site safety, albeit brief. A mother travels from Tamworth to tell inquisitors of the death of her 17-year-old son and urge improved workplace safety. At least one Sydney daily prefers to lead its report of that day's events with the claim of an ageing male contractor that he knew what it felt like to be raped. His claim, like most others, was subject to no supporting evidence or cross examination. ............... Following faithfully in the footstep of George Bush, Australia formally announces it will not ratify the Kyoto climate change treaty aimed at cutting greenhouse gas emissions. "It is not in Australia's interests to ratify the Kyoto protocol," Prime Minister Howard says. Howard's Government signed the treaty but has steadily distanced itself from ratification since the election of energy industry-friendly US president Bush. Meanwhile, in a Sydney courthouse the $60 million Inquisition, follows its predictable, pre-determined course.
|
Search All Issues | Latest Issue | Previous Issues | Print Latest Issue |
© 1999-2002 Workers Online |
|