|
Issue No. 139 | 07 June 2002 |
With Prejudice
Interview: Class Action Safety: A Mother's Tale Unions: The Hottest Seat in Town International: Defensive Enterprise Economics: A Super Deal? History: A Radical Life Media: Cross Purposes Review: When the Force Is Unconscious Poetry: Wouldn't It Be Loverly
Grieving Mum Turns Cole Around Hamberger Grilled Over AWA Scam Government Shrugs Off Death Sentence Charge Action To Pay Foreign Crew Aussie Wages Birds Get More Protection Than Workers Budget Delivers - But Not For DOCS Statewide Ban On Grain Loading Howard Soft On Organised Crime? UN Honours Building Union Drugs Program Award-Winning Poet Wins Right To Write Mahathir Told to Release Labour Activisits Horta Backs Western Sahara Independence
The Soapbox The Locker Room Bosswatch Week in Review
Robbo's Rave Latham Ad Nauseum Our Home Is Girt By Wire Hands Off Hooligans!
Labor Council of NSW |
The Soapbox It’s The Members, Stupid.
************** When Neville Wran announced that he was stepping down as Premier at the 1986 NSW ALP Conference, a handful of Party powerbrokers retreated to a small room under the stage of Sydney's Town Hall. They emerged some time later to tell the citizens of New South Wales who their new Premier would be. The State Labor Government never recovered. 16 years later the same small room was in use again. Last Sunday week a handful of union Secretaries from the ruling faction of the NSW ALP fronted Labor's Federal leader to warn him against any change to the rule that gives unions 60 per cent of the vote at the Party Conference. When it comes to NSW Labor, backroom politics still rules. The current argument over union representation is a classic insiders debate. The formal ALP-union link is characterised by the dominance of entrenched hierarchies on both sides of the movement, dealing with each other to the almost total exclusion of their respective memberships. Those union leaders who are giving Simon Crean a working over are just as likely as Labor MPs to be viewed in the eyes of the wider community - including their own members - as insiders in the political process. Both ALP branch affairs and the Party-union link are characterised by a democratic deficit, at odds with the modern political demand for direct involvement and participation. On this page last week, Labor Council Secretary John Robertson argued for changes to Party rules to give unions 50 per cent of the vote in preselecting ALP candidates. When Robertson writes of giving "unions" preselection votes, read union Secretaries rather than union members themselves. What particular wisdom would a small group of almost exclusively male, middle aged union Secretaries bring to the process of choosing Labor's parliamentary candidates? Are these the people who should determine who is best equipped to take the fight to Larry Anthony on the far north coast, or to Jackie Kelly in Sydney's outer western suburbs? Neville Wran's review of the New South Wales ALP found massive disillusionment among the Party's members. Across the state, one clear message came through: we're not listened to anymore. To further centralise decision making by moving to a system where Labor's local candidates are chosen in that small back room at the Sydney Town Hall, rather than locally, would be a step in exactly the wrong direction. ALP membership and union affiliation will be given real meaning again only when the Party embraces one core principle: let individual ALP members and members of ALP affiliated unions talk for themselves. Defenders of the ALP-union nexus argue that union affiliation gives the Party a formal link with close to 2 million working Australians. This is true. Let's go further, and actually give those unionists a say in the decisions of the Party that their union membership financially supports. I have no problem with giving union members voting rights in Party preselections in the electorates they reside in. Under such a system, thousands of working people in every state and federal electorate would have a direct vote for who their ALP candidate is. Aspiring Labor MPs would be forced to concentrate on communicating a message to a broad cross section of the community. Candidates would be far more likely than now to campaign on real issues affecting people. Issues based advocacy would become more important than the ability to cleverly manage ALP branch books. The role for full time union officials would be very different to now. Rather than wielding block votes and factional power, union leaders would need to concentrate on organising their members to campaign on the issues affecting their lives, in order to have candidates respond to them. This would be a healthy development for unions. The union renewal agenda concentrates on workplace leadership and member activism, and consciously seeks to devolve power. Yet for all the emphasis on organising and campaigning in the workplace, Australian unions' approach to politics hasn't changed at all. The empowerment of union members in the affairs of Australia's only trade union based political party is long overdue. Luke Foley is the Secretary of the Australian Services Union.
|
Search All Issues | Latest Issue | Previous Issues | Print Latest Issue |
© 1999-2002 Workers Online |
|