|
Issue No. 136 | 17 May 2002 |
Modern Labour
Interview: Licking the Wounds Industrial: The Accidental Tourist Unions: Stars And Stripes International: The Un-Promised Land History: Mate Against Mate Politics: Reith's Gong Poetry: You've Got a Friend Review: War on Terror: Now Showing Satire: Burmese Regime Makes Genuine Commitment To Pretence Of Change
Solidarity In The Post To East Timor Workers Call Abbott On Democracy Bluff Wran Tells MPs: Talk to Unions Family First on Conference Agenda Cole Commission Declares Paper War Budget Attacks Retirement Incomes PSA Challenges Carr�s Secrecy Shield Welfare Staff Strike Out At Harrassment Fake Notes Expose Government as Tax Cheat Labor Faces Acid Test on Asylum Seekers New Project Encourages Cultural Exchanges Bush�s Western Saharan War And Oil Deal
The Soapbox The Locker Room Bosswatch Postcard Week in Review
More May Day Hate Mail What Women Want Chucking a Wobbly Is Caustic Costello the Despot of Despair? East Timor: Independent Or Mendicant?
Labor Council of NSW |
Tool Shed Censor Moi
*********************** Insipid stewardship of our civil freedoms has become the stock and trade of the nation's chief legal officer. While attorneys general have traditionally played the important roll of being a bridge between the legislature and judiciary and an advocate for the Rule of law in the hurly burly of political discourse, Williams has lacked both the heart and stomach for the fight. To steal a Keating Hewson insult, he's a shiver looking for a spine to run up. From the day he took office and was given the task of rogering the Legal Aid, Williams has been the most ineffectual of advocates for his fraternity. When the High court was subjected to unprecedented political attack over the Wik decision, Williams was struck dumb. When Justice Kirby was viciously attacked by Senator Heffernen, he was missing in action again - leaving it to the likes of Downer and Abbott to defend both the man and the institution. His handling of the doomed anti-terror laws were similarly ineffectual. Allowing his political masters to dictate the drafting of the legislation has left him with a Draconian dogs breakfast that any self-respecting liberal would disown. Among the outrageous provision are proposals that would see unionists involved in legitimate industrial action locked up as terrorists. That a Senate Committee dominated by Coalition Senators as condemned the Bill as unacceptable gives some indication of the shortcomings of this exercise. For Williams, the one-time Libertarian way out of his depth, the rebuttal is an abject embarrassment. In this context, the Bais Moi decision is totally consistent. Asleep at the wheel, or just asleep, Williams has let others dictate his portfolio. The censorship authorities approved the film for release when the Howard Government was in thralls of its khaki election campaign. The decision was made on its merits. But now it's been released the usual moralising suspects have exerted pressure on Howard; he's given his orders to his Attorney General, who himself has pressured the censors into a humiliating back down. We're focusing on Dazzle, so we won't dwell on the fact that the kerfuffle has given the film an audience far greater than the arthouse fringe it would have normally attracted. We won't even question why it is a movie where women perpetrate violence on men that has fueled the current outrage, while blokes in fatigues continue to cut 'em up from all angles. All we'll say is this, when there's a choice between freedoms and knee-jerk politics, there's no contest with this government. And Williams - whose job is to be the voice of sanity in this regard - is as guilty as the rest of them. Watching Williams justify the backdown has been so excrutiating it should rate as an extreme sport. The vacant stare, the tortured diction, the wavering voice, the quivering lip: to watch Dazzle to perform in public is like watching a drunkard attempt Karaoke; you just wish they had a loved one to tell them to play to their strengths. One suspects Dazzle realizes this, which is why he is currently more interested in finding a position on the Bench than carrying out his current job. The personal tragedy for Williams is that by the time he pulls the strings for an appointment he will be bereft of any credibility within the profession he should never have left. But the damage his ineffectual tenure has done to the Australian way of life will be even more enduring.
View our Gallery of Tools Nominate a Tool!
|
Search All Issues | Latest Issue | Previous Issues | Print Latest Issue |
© 1999-2002 Workers Online |
|