|
Issue No. 134 | 03 May 2002 |
The Hijacking of May Day
Interview: Youth Group History: Back To The Future Industrial: On the Street Unions: The New Deal Legal: The Police State Road Women: What Women Want Politics: Street Party International: The Costs of War Review: Songs of Solidarity Satire: Bono Satisfies World Hunger for Preachy Rockstars Poetry: Woomera
Yarra Seamen Take Border Stand Kinkos Copies Anti-Union Script Nike Told to Shoosh on Sweatshops Rapper Wins Wobbly Anthem Prize Unions Target Labour Hire Bidding War Rally Targets Tight-Arse Costello Councils To Be Audited On Language Allowance Scope For Payback In Privacy Limitations Heavyweight Push For Medibank Private To Stay Public East Timor MPs Question Timor Gap Plan Artists' Union Bans Voice For Peace
The Soapbox The Locker Room Bosswatch Week in Review Tool Shed
M1 Open Letter Julian Online May Day Debacle Mothers Day Musings Greetings From Canada
Labor Council of NSW |
News War on Terror Targets Unions
Malaysian labour activist Irene Xavier says proposals, providing for detention without trial and the strip-searching of children, were �uncannily similar� to the first steps her country took in dismantling democracy. "The arguments for your anti-terrorism bill are almost identical to those put up for our Internal Security Act. When it was passed in the 1960s we were told it would target terrorists and have no consequences for law abiding people. They used the same emotional arguments about dangerous people to get it passed. "As everybody knows, the people being detained without trial today are not terrorists, they are labour activists and members of opposition political parties." Xavier and Mabel Au are in Australia at the tail end of an international speaking tour aimed at having Malaysia's Internal Security Act overturned. In Malaysia, roll-over provisions similar to those in the Howard bill, have been used to imprison people without trial for 20 years. Australian-educated labour activist, Tian Chua, is facing his third year of incarceration, without charge or trial. Labor Council will lobby federal politicians in a bid to have legislation, which would have allowed for the indefinite detention of protestors during the '98 waterfront dispute, rejected. Building Trades Group secretary, Tony Pappas, labelled its implications "bloody frightening". "It will remove our basic rights and civil liberties," he said. "Those mass demonstrations at Victoria Docks would have been caught squarely within the definition of this Act. It's extraordinary to think, if it happened under this legislation, we could have been punished by life imprisonment." Pappas is especially worried that the legislation will enter parliament without widespread understanding of its scope. The media, he said, had virtually ignored its implications, despite strong warnings from consititutional lawyers and civil rights advocates. Pappas urged unionists to "get off their rings" and start lobbying politicians, especially Labor and Green MPs. He labelled the anti-terrorism bill the "most draconian" legislation ever introduced to an Australian Parliament. Labor Council spokeswoman Alison Peters said the unfortunate implications for Malaysians was that Prime Minister Mathatir Mohammed would use Australian, Indian, British and US anti-terror legislation to justify retention of his country's Internal Security Act.
|
Search All Issues | Latest Issue | Previous Issues | Print Latest Issue |
© 1999-2002 Workers Online |
|