|
Issue No. 134 | 03 May 2002 |
The Hijacking of May Day
Interview: Youth Group History: Back To The Future Industrial: On the Street Unions: The New Deal Legal: The Police State Road Women: What Women Want Politics: Street Party International: The Costs of War Review: Songs of Solidarity Satire: Bono Satisfies World Hunger for Preachy Rockstars Poetry: Woomera
Yarra Seamen Take Border Stand Kinkos Copies Anti-Union Script Nike Told to Shoosh on Sweatshops Rapper Wins Wobbly Anthem Prize Unions Target Labour Hire Bidding War Rally Targets Tight-Arse Costello Councils To Be Audited On Language Allowance Scope For Payback In Privacy Limitations Heavyweight Push For Medibank Private To Stay Public East Timor MPs Question Timor Gap Plan Artists' Union Bans Voice For Peace
The Soapbox The Locker Room Bosswatch Week in Review Tool Shed
M1 Open Letter Julian Online May Day Debacle Mothers Day Musings Greetings From Canada
Labor Council of NSW |
Editorial The Hijacking of May Day
Here were a couple of hundred political extremists making life hell for ordinary workers - be they the bank workers forced to get to work at 5am or the police officers facing physical danger from juvenille tactics. They have 365 days to choose from, why take our's? These were not 'May Day protestors' as portrayed in the media, they were the remnants of S11, who induced media attention on the threat of violence - including the outrageous message that they were being trained by the Intifada The tragedy of M1 is that many in the union movement have sympathy with the issues driving the protests: we have taken a public stand of the plight of asylum seekers, we do work hard to blunt the excesses of the corporates and of course, we support trad union rights. It's just that their tactics are so counterproductive. It's immature politics that only ends up marginalising the public; the actions of people acting without a constituency, thumbing their noses, not just to authority but to the history of the Australian working class. There are no doubt many well-intentioned and motivated people within the M1 movement and they should not be condemned en masse. But they really need to think about what they are trying to achieve from this orgy of self-indulgence. If they want to smash the state, good luck. If they want to bring about meaningful change in a Democracy, they should rethink their tactics. The irony of the affair was that the M1 debacle took place as the union movement proper took further steps to broaden their appeal. The union anthem contest, won by a 24-year-old rapper from Campbelltown, Swarmy G, was a successful attempt to find new ways of reaching people who are not in the movement. The media response was overwhelmingly positive. Meanwhile, building unions joined forces to turn their back on generations of ideological differences and get their house together in the interests of their membership. The choice is to mainstream or marginalize our message. Inducing media interest with the threat of violence is not what May Day is all about. Indeed, it is an insult to its' history. Peter Lewis Editor
|
Search All Issues | Latest Issue | Previous Issues | Print Latest Issue |
© 1999-2002 Workers Online |
|