
Issue No 111		14 September 2001

LaborNET	Ask Neale	Tool of the Week

Compo

Round Two Begins

Nancy Searle reviews the Sheahan Report and highlights some of the areas of concern to injured workers.


	I Work & I Vote

***********************

The report of the Commission of Inquiry into Workers Compensation Common Law Matters ("the Sheahan Inquiry) was published on 12 September 2001. Copies of the report (totalling 49 pages in addition to annexures) are available from Workcover, ph; 131050, or from the Workcover website, http://www.workcover.nsw.gov.au.

A meeting of affiliates was held on 12 September 2001, to discuss the recommendations of the Sheahan Inquiry. Minister Della Bosca attended the meeting of affiliates and confirmed the Government was keen to have the reforms to the Workers Compensation scheme in place and operating by 1 January 2002.

The Minister indicated to the meeting that the report of Justice Sheahan was 'more thorough than the Government had anticipated and was well researched'. The Minister went on to say it was the hope of Government that the new Workers Compensation Scheme could be brought into effect on 1 January 2002 and that any issues of dispute could be resolved amicably between Government and the unions.

The report contains a number of recommendations which, if implemented, will improve benefits to injured workers. These recommendations include:

� "that the requirement of 'election' be repealed, but that the recovery of economic loss damages preclude the receipt of any further statutory benefits."

The unions will urge the Government to implement this recommendation. It will mean an injured worker will no longer be forced to "choose" between a common law action and an action under the statutory scheme. The danger has been if a worker chooses to pursue a common law action and is ultimately unsuccessful in that action, the worker was then not able to pursue an action under the statutory scheme. By removing this "election provision" an injured worker will not have to suffer the anxiety of making this choice, knowing if they are unsuccessful in a common law action their right to benefits is extinguished. This recommendation means a worker can pursue a common law action, and should that action be unsuccessful, they are still able to pursue benefits under the statutory ("no fault") scheme. This is a recommendation which will result in a great deal less trauma for an injured worker, which can only be a seen as a bonus.

"that a limited right to claim benefits in respect of the cost of "gratuitous domestic care" (Griffiths v Kerkemyer) be provided for in only the statutory scheme, but on very strict conditions."

This recommendation relates to domestic assistance provided to an injured worker by family or friends. At present, assistance provided by family and friends is not directly compensable. Justice Sheahan has made a recommendation that such assistance should be compensated under the statutory scheme if the injured worker needs the care of family and friends and the care is directed by the injured worker's medical practitioner. This recommendation should be implemented as a matter of urgency as it will greatly alleviate levels of anxiety on injured workers and their carers.

Whilst there are recommendations contained within Justice Sheahan's report which will benefit injured workers it should be made clear that some of the recommendations contained within the report cause the union movement a great deal of concern. The recommendations which are of concern include the following:-

"that, as soon as the scheme's financial position permits:

(i) the indexation of s66 benefits be reinstated; and

(ii) the maximum amount recoverable under the combined operation of sections 66 and 67 be increased gradually to $250,000.00 and indexed thereafter."

This recommendation is beneficial, however, it is imperative that indexation of benefits under Section 66 (lump sum for permanent impairment) be reintroduced within a finite period and that the maximum benefit under Sections 66 and 67 (pain and suffering) be increased to $250,000.00 also within a finite period. The Government have been informed the unions want these increases to commence within a known time frame. The Unions will continue to push the Government to introduce the increased benefit within a finite time frame. We believe to do so would be a show of good faith on the part of the Government.

A recommendation contained within Justice Sheahan's report which is totally unacceptable is the recommendation relating to threshold for access to common law. The recommendation reads as follows:-

"that only workers assessed to have a whole person impairment of 20% or more should be entitled to make a claim for economic loss damages."

A threshold of 20% whole person impairment is far too high and will be unattainable by the vast majority of injured workers. Advice provided to Labor Council by leading medical professionals indicates that even a worker who has undergone a mid foot amputation would fail to reach a threshold of 20%.

A threshold of 20% is absolutely unacceptable to Unions and this issue will be pursued with the Government with a view to securing a threshold for access to common law which is fair and which will not result in injured workers' access to benefits being diminished.

Workers are urged to continue to lobby their local MP's to support the Labor Council's campaign to ensure injured workers in NSW are not worse off under the Government's proposals.

   More details from the LaborNET compo page

  View entire issue - print all of the articles!

  Issue 111 contents

Interview: Amidst the Debris
ACTU President Sharan Burrow surveys the wreckage from a week that rocked the world.

Politics: Consequences of Empire
The horror of the events in New York has not led to all American and international observers feeling committed to bloody revenge.

Industrial: Grounded
Ansett workers lay bare their feelings at seeing their company driven into oblivion.

International: Election Results from East Timor
Fretelin as expected has topped the poll in East Timor�s first free democratic election and the violence predicted by some has not eventuated.

E-Change: 3.2 The Electronic Consumerist
In their latest instalment Peter Lewis and Michael Gadiel ask how effective has the law become in safeguarding the things that really matter to us?

Legal: Howard's Falkland War
Zoe Reynolds chronicles the bizarre tale of the Tampa and how a group of refugees bacame pawns in a bigger political game.

Compo: Round Two Begins
Nancy Searle reviews the Sheahan Report and highlights some of the areas of concern to injured workers.

Economics: Knowledge, Power, Banking
Raj Patel questions whether a new World Bank initiative is actually designed to control the way the Third World thinks.

Review: Political Theatre
The Naked Theatre Company is a youthful, adventurous, professional, Sydney theatre company committed to the development and production of Australian playwrights.

Satire: Howard US Visit "Marginally Overshadowed"
Australian Prime Minister John Howard has said his US trip was a complete success, if slightly upstaged towards the middle.

» Howard Deserts Ansett Workers

» Trans Tasman Battle for Entitlements

» Qantas Workers Move To Protect Their Entitlements

» Unions Denounce Muslim Attacks

» Fund Established for New York Workers

» Australian Unionist Lost in New York

» US Flight Crews Support Ansett Workers

» Compo: Threshold Too High

» Della Moves on Premium Evasion

» Travel Site Severs Burma Links

» Paint Company Wants Strike Declared Illegal

» Casino Staff Locked Out Again

» Tax Staff to Strike Back

» Union Applauds Deet Ruling On Clothing

» Unions Take Message to Migrant Workers

» Get Ready to Wobble

» Activists' Notebook

» STOP PRESS: Howard Rolls Abbott on Entitlements